22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

proposed changes to the vegetation and pest management activities as currently practiced. On<br />

February 8, 2013, <strong>Reclamation</strong> clarified via email that the information on pesticide use as noted<br />

in Section 4.3.3.5 was included in the BA to respond to USFWS's request to provide a complete<br />

Baseline <strong>of</strong> Project operation, and <strong>Reclamation</strong> is not requesting consultation on pesticide use as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> their request for formal consultation.<br />

Additionally, as part <strong>of</strong> their proposed action in the final BA, <strong>Reclamation</strong> included a statement<br />

that in dry years when the Project Supply is limited, it may not be possible to maintain the<br />

proposed minimum Tule Lake Sump 1A elevations because <strong>of</strong> decreased run<strong>of</strong>f and drainage<br />

from Project land. <strong>Reclamation</strong> stated in the first paragraph on page 4-38 <strong>of</strong> the BA<br />

(<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012) that this situation is outside <strong>of</strong> their control, and Tule Lake elevations may<br />

decline to levels less than the proposed minimums and sucker relocation may be necessary.<br />

However, after finalizing the BA, <strong>Reclamation</strong> conducted further analysis on the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

not meeting minimum elevations in Tule Lake. On April 9, 2013, <strong>Reclamation</strong> provided this<br />

analysis to the USFWS via email, concluding that if the Klamath Project received irrigation<br />

deliveries, the likelihood <strong>of</strong> not maintaining minimum surface elevation in Tule Lake Sump 1A<br />

was very rare. Therefore, <strong>Reclamation</strong> requested via email on April 25, 2013, that the paragraph<br />

on page 4-38 and associated Appendix 4B be removed from the proposed action and not<br />

analyzed.<br />

On May3, 2013, USFWS received <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s letter, clarifying and updating the proposed<br />

action with additional Conservation Measures. These measures included providing an additional<br />

$500,000 in FY2013 to support captive propagation; capturing and transporting listed suckers in<br />

Lake Ewauna and releasing them in UKL; and investigating the reduction <strong>of</strong> flows at Link River<br />

Dam to determine if there are feasible management options to minimize effects <strong>of</strong> entrainment at<br />

Link River Dam on larvae and juvenile listed suckers at key times when they are present at the<br />

south end <strong>of</strong> UKL.<br />

On May 7, 2013, <strong>Reclamation</strong> and NMFS met in Medford, OR to discuss several issues NMFS<br />

needed to be addressed prior to issuance <strong>of</strong> the anticipated, joint BiOps on <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s<br />

proposed action. The issues involved the minimum flows during the spring, magnitude and<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> high flow events, and the restoration funding.<br />

On May 10, 2013, NMFS received <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s May 9, 2013, letter documenting the mutual<br />

agreement between NMFS and <strong>Reclamation</strong> to extend the consultation on the endangered<br />

southern resident killer whale DPS (Orcinus orca) for one year.<br />

On May 29, 2013, NMFS received <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s letter revising the proposed action to further<br />

minimize adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the Project on the SONCC coho salmon ESU and its critical habitat.<br />

The revised proposed action consists <strong>of</strong>: (1) increasing the minimum daily IGD flow targets for<br />

April, May, and June; (2) clarifying flexibility in operations regarding meeting minimum daily<br />

average flows downstream <strong>of</strong> IGD; (3) clarifying that the proposed action daily modeled IGD<br />

flows during high flow events will be achieved during real-time operations; (4) increasing annual<br />

fisheries habitat restoration funding to $500,000; and (5) using adaptive management for<br />

minimizing fish disease.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!