22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.5.2 Klamath River Basin Adjudication<br />

Based on the Oregon Water Resources Department’s Findings <strong>of</strong> Fact and Order <strong>of</strong><br />

Determination in the Klamath River Basin Adjudication, the United States holds senior water<br />

rights on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Klamath Tribes in certain reaches <strong>of</strong> major tributaries to the UKL. If the<br />

United States makes calls on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Klamath Tribes for regulation <strong>of</strong> junior waters users in<br />

these tributaries, the Oregon Water Resources Department’s regulation <strong>of</strong> junior water users<br />

could result in higher inflows into UKL, and thus could increase flows in the mainstem Klamath<br />

River for coho salmon. However, as discussed in the Background and Consultation History<br />

section, the potential effects <strong>of</strong> the Findings <strong>of</strong> Fact and Order <strong>of</strong> Determination are still<br />

uncertain and will likely remain uncertain for several years.<br />

11.5.3 Residential Development and Existing Residential Infrastructure<br />

Human population growth in the action is expected to remain relatively stable over the next 10<br />

years as California’s economy continues to recover from a long-lasting nationwide recession.<br />

The recession has had significant economic impacts at both the statewide and local scales with<br />

widespread impacts to residential development and resource industries such as timber and<br />

fisheries. However, some development will continue to occur which, on a small-scale, can<br />

impact coho salmon habitat. Once development and associated infrastructure (e.g., roads,<br />

drainage, and water development) are established, the impacts to aquatic species are expected to<br />

be permanent. Anticipated impacts to aquatic resources include loss <strong>of</strong> riparian vegetation,<br />

changes to channel morphology and dynamics, altered hydrologic regimes (increased storm<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f), increased sediment loading, and elevated water temperatures where shade-providing<br />

canopy is removed. The presence <strong>of</strong> structures and/or roads near waters may lead to the removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> large woody debris in order to protect those structures from flood impacts. The anticipated<br />

impacts to Pacific salmonids from continued residential development are expected to be<br />

sustained and locally intense. Commonly, there are also effects <strong>of</strong> home pesticide use and<br />

roadway run<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> automobile pollutants, introductions <strong>of</strong> invasive species to nearby streams and<br />

ponds, attraction <strong>of</strong> salmonid predators due to human occupation (e.g., raccoons), increased<br />

incidences <strong>of</strong> poaching, and loss <strong>of</strong> riparian habitat due to land clearing activities. All <strong>of</strong> these<br />

factors associated with residential development can have negative impacts on salmon<br />

populations.<br />

A subset <strong>of</strong> this development may occur for the purposes <strong>of</strong> marijuana cultivation. Watersheds<br />

associated with the action area have been used to produce marijuana crops both legally and<br />

illegally. California law allows for the production <strong>of</strong> marijuana for medicinal purposes under<br />

Proposition 215 which establishes limits to the production <strong>of</strong> marijuana by patients or their<br />

designated growers. NMFS does not expect that cultivation <strong>of</strong> marijuana under Proposition 215<br />

limits will result in adverse effects to coho salmon habitat because these cultivations are<br />

relatively small. However, illegal marijuana production within watersheds <strong>of</strong> the action area can<br />

at times result in grow operations <strong>of</strong> over 100,000 plants; <strong>of</strong>ten these illegal grows occur on<br />

federal lands. NMFS expects these illegal grow operations to continue on isolated parcels in the<br />

watersheds adjacent to the action area. These grow operations can adversely affect coho salmon<br />

habitat by diversion <strong>of</strong> water for irrigation, resulting in the drying <strong>of</strong> streams or draining <strong>of</strong> pools<br />

that provide rearing habitat for coho salmon juveniles. The operations can also contaminate<br />

288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!