Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

16.2.2 Modeled UKL average weekly elevations (ft) for Period of Record Proposed Action Model Study 2L_MW_7_O dated December 7, 2012 Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 7-Oct 4139.00 4138.26 4140.37 4140.25 4140.58 4140.04 4139.77 4139.70 4138.90 4138.76 4139.51 14-Oct 4138.99 4138.22 4140.40 4140.26 4140.64 4139.96 4139.88 4139.65 4138.87 4138.73 4139.44 21-Oct 4138.97 4138.22 4140.47 4140.37 4140.79 4139.84 4139.86 4139.57 4138.80 4138.64 4139.35 28-Oct 4139.01 4138.16 4140.48 4140.45 4140.97 4139.73 4139.83 4139.48 4138.78 4138.50 4139.27 4-Nov 4139.05 4138.06 4140.54 4140.56 4141.15 4139.80 4139.83 4139.39 4138.77 4138.52 4139.22 11-Nov 4139.11 4138.14 4140.80 4140.71 4141.36 4139.88 4139.88 4139.38 4138.80 4138.60 4139.22 18-Nov 4139.27 4138.19 4140.94 4140.83 4141.47 4139.95 4139.97 4139.42 4138.91 4138.65 4139.23 25-Nov 4139.40 4138.45 4141.06 4141.07 4141.52 4140.07 4140.05 4139.54 4139.12 4138.72 4139.30 2-Dec 4139.57 4138.86 4141.26 4141.31 4141.56 4140.22 4140.21 4139.71 4139.47 4138.83 4139.41 9-Dec 4139.76 4138.99 4141.41 4141.49 4141.61 4140.41 4140.38 4139.87 4139.83 4138.99 4139.52 16-Dec 4140.10 4139.16 4141.62 4141.63 4141.65 4140.60 4140.55 4140.19 4140.04 4139.20 4139.64 23-Dec 4140.31 4139.41 4141.69 4141.70 4141.70 4140.75 4140.69 4140.63 4140.25 4139.42 4139.76 30-Dec 4140.49 4139.65 4141.74 4141.74 4141.74 4140.92 4140.85 4140.80 4140.44 4139.59 4139.87 6-Jan 4140.74 4139.89 4141.78 4141.78 4141.78 4141.09 4141.00 4140.96 4140.66 4139.75 4139.97 13-Jan 4141.00 4140.19 4141.82 4141.82 4141.82 4141.27 4141.19 4141.17 4140.85 4139.93 4140.05 20-Jan 4141.19 4140.37 4141.87 4141.87 4141.87 4141.41 4141.36 4141.44 4141.06 4140.34 4140.24 27-Jan 4141.35 4140.58 4141.92 4141.92 4141.92 4141.62 4141.54 4141.74 4141.25 4140.70 4140.56 3-Feb 4141.56 4140.80 4141.97 4141.97 4141.97 4141.79 4141.73 4141.97 4141.41 4140.91 4140.76 10-Feb 4141.83 4141.00 4142.03 4142.03 4142.03 4141.94 4141.93 4142.20 4141.58 4141.16 4140.93 17-Feb 4142.03 4141.19 4142.13 4142.12 4142.13 4142.11 4142.13 4142.40 4141.74 4141.43 4141.17 24-Feb 4142.30 4141.45 4142.23 4142.22 4142.23 4142.32 4142.34 4142.52 4141.89 4141.68 4141.36 3-Mar 4142.60 4141.66 4142.33 4142.31 4142.33 4142.53 4142.56 4142.61 4142.09 4141.90 4141.52 10-Mar 4142.72 4141.94 4142.42 4142.41 4142.42 4142.72 4142.65 4142.71 4142.36 4142.13 4141.69 17-Mar 4142.81 4142.37 4142.51 4142.50 4142.51 4142.81 4142.79 4142.80 4142.51 4142.44 4141.95 24-Mar 4142.90 4142.60 4142.60 4142.59 4142.60 4142.90 4142.90 4142.89 4142.60 4142.67 4142.08 491
Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 31-Mar 4142.99 4142.69 4142.69 4142.68 4142.69 4142.99 4142.99 4142.98 4142.69 4142.90 4142.23 7-Apr 4143.08 4142.79 4142.79 4142.77 4142.79 4143.08 4143.08 4143.06 4142.79 4143.07 4142.43 14-Apr 4143.14 4142.90 4142.90 4142.88 4142.90 4143.14 4143.14 4143.12 4142.90 4143.09 4142.51 21-Apr 4143.15 4143.02 4143.02 4143.00 4143.02 4143.19 4143.19 4143.17 4143.02 4143.06 4142.58 28-Apr 4143.17 4143.13 4143.10 4143.12 4143.13 4143.24 4143.22 4143.22 4143.11 4143.09 4142.58 5-May 4143.19 4143.24 4143.15 4143.22 4143.25 4143.27 4143.25 4143.25 4143.23 4143.14 4142.60 12-May 4143.16 4143.23 4143.23 4143.24 4143.29 4143.27 4143.29 4143.23 4143.29 4143.12 4142.57 19-May 4143.05 4143.09 4143.19 4143.24 4143.25 4143.30 4143.30 4143.21 4143.28 4142.99 4142.50 26-May 4142.96 4142.97 4143.07 4143.18 4143.16 4143.27 4143.25 4143.20 4143.18 4142.81 4142.51 2-Jun 4142.97 4142.86 4142.87 4143.10 4143.09 4143.22 4143.13 4143.13 4143.06 4142.80 4142.46 9-Jun 4142.92 4142.68 4142.60 4143.00 4143.01 4143.15 4143.02 4143.00 4142.98 4142.86 4142.35 16-Jun 4142.75 4142.51 4142.32 4142.82 4142.93 4142.97 4142.88 4142.93 4142.79 4142.75 4142.16 23-Jun 4142.58 4142.41 4142.11 4142.69 4142.80 4142.74 4142.72 4142.85 4142.56 4142.56 4141.92 30-Jun 4142.38 4142.31 4141.92 4142.51 4142.57 4142.51 4142.55 4142.71 4142.33 4142.32 4141.68 7-Jul 4142.12 4142.26 4141.75 4142.34 4142.28 4142.28 4142.36 4142.55 4142.04 4142.04 4141.49 14-Jul 4141.82 4142.33 4141.69 4142.19 4141.95 4142.01 4142.15 4142.27 4141.77 4141.78 4141.36 21-Jul 4141.53 4142.28 4141.62 4141.97 4141.64 4141.69 4141.85 4141.96 4141.43 4141.57 4141.09 28-Jul 4141.22 4142.07 4141.45 4141.71 4141.31 4141.39 4141.69 4141.67 4141.07 4141.29 4140.81 4-Aug 4140.90 4141.81 4141.24 4141.48 4141.01 4141.13 4141.62 4141.33 4140.62 4141.05 4140.58 11-Aug 4140.55 4141.51 4141.00 4141.29 4140.81 4140.87 4141.41 4140.95 4140.24 4140.79 4140.31 18-Aug 4140.21 4141.31 4140.81 4141.11 4140.62 4140.62 4141.13 4140.56 4139.97 4140.54 4140.03 25-Aug 4139.81 4141.12 4140.63 4140.91 4140.40 4140.36 4140.82 4140.24 4139.70 4140.29 4139.79 1-Sep 4139.43 4140.93 4140.53 4140.69 4140.21 4140.14 4140.53 4139.91 4139.39 4140.09 4139.57 8-Sep 4139.10 4140.74 4140.49 4140.58 4140.02 4139.94 4140.26 4139.63 4139.14 4139.93 4139.34 15-Sep 4138.85 4140.61 4140.47 4140.62 4139.90 4139.76 4140.05 4139.40 4138.95 4139.80 4139.21 22-Sep 4138.64 4140.45 4140.39 4140.57 4140.00 4139.56 4139.89 4139.17 4138.75 4139.67 4139.06 29-Sep 4138.41 4140.34 4140.29 4140.56 4140.06 4139.58 4139.77 4139.00 4138.74 4139.56 4138.95 492
Page 1 and 2:
National Marine Fisheries Service U
Page 3 and 4:
7.4.5 LRS and SNS Population Dynami
Page 5 and 6:
11.1.5 Critical Assumptions .......
Page 7 and 8:
16 APPENDICIES ....................
Page 9 and 10:
Table 8.2 UKL end-of-month elevatio
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1. The act
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 11.17. Coho salmon fry habit
Page 15 and 16:
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Abbrevia
Page 17 and 18:
Abbreviation/Acronym YTEP WDFW WRIM
Page 19 and 20:
In 2001, the Services issued BiOps
Page 21 and 22:
Findings of Fact and Order of Deter
Page 23 and 24:
proposed changes to the vegetation
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3.1. The action area for Rec
Page 27 and 28:
4 PROPOSED ACTION Reclamation propo
Page 29 and 30:
4.2 Element Two Operate the Project
Page 31 and 32:
October 1 and March 1. The proposed
Page 33 and 34:
Reclamation incorporated the 1981 t
Page 35 and 36:
Provide Project irrigation deliveri
Page 37 and 38:
Table 4.3. UKL fill rate adjustment
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4.5. Calculation of fall/wint
Page 41 and 42:
Flows below IGD are ultimately the
Page 43 and 44:
The EWA, Project Supply, and UKL Re
Page 45 and 46:
Table 4.8. Environmental Water Acco
Page 47 and 48:
eleases somewhat on the ascending l
Page 49 and 50:
fish disease, die off, entrainment,
Page 51 and 52:
acre-feet when the Project Supply c
Page 53 and 54:
Table 4.11. Monthly maximum Lower K
Page 55 and 56:
4.2.4 Ramp-Down Rates at Iron Gate
Page 57 and 58:
progresses and EWA volumes are upda
Page 59 and 60:
O&M activities are carried out eith
Page 61 and 62:
1. The A Canal has six headgates th
Page 63 and 64:
Therefore, Reclamation proposes to
Page 65 and 66:
coordinate with the NMFS to develop
Page 67 and 68:
the confluence with Omogar Creek at
Page 69 and 70:
though several major improvements t
Page 71 and 72:
Sucker larvae transform into age-0
Page 73 and 74:
units: (1) Clear Lake; (2) Tule Lak
Page 75 and 76:
Figure 7.2. Adult spawning populati
Page 77 and 78:
Table 7.1. Estimated LRS and SNS ad
Page 79 and 80:
1905, Ch. 567, 33 Stat. 714). The P
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 7.4 Modeled April through No
Page 83 and 84:
7.9.2 Klamath Basin The Oregon Clim
Page 85 and 86:
A change in mean precipitation rang
Page 87 and 88:
Table 7.2 Impaired water bodies wit
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7.3 Seasonal comparisons of p
Page 91 and 92:
ammonia that is lethal to 50 percen
Page 93 and 94:
Table 7.4 Estimated external phosph
Page 95 and 96:
examination of juvenile suckers fro
Page 97 and 98:
Evaluation of baseline hydrology in
Page 99 and 100:
2012 1931 through 2012 12.6% 0.24 5
Page 101 and 102:
The overall water year trend (Table
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 7.7 Sprague River trends, wa
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 7.9 Sprague River trends, wa
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 7.12 Williamson River trends
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 7.14 UKL trends, water years
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 7.17 UKL: net inflow departu
Page 113 and 114:
7.10.3.3 Competition and Predation
Page 115 and 116:
By late July, surviving larval suck
Page 117 and 118:
Threat Nature of Threat Life Stage
Page 119 and 120:
2011) and increased adult spawning
Page 121 and 122:
Based on the best available informa
Page 123 and 124:
contrast, water levels began 1.5 ft
Page 125 and 126:
evaporation and seepage estimated a
Page 127 and 128:
prolonged low oxygen conditions if
Page 129 and 130:
The April through September 4,034.6
Page 131 and 132:
8 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ON LOST RIV
Page 133 and 134:
Although the volume of Project wate
Page 135 and 136:
than 1 m), and fitting one or more
Page 137 and 138:
Figure 8.3. UKL elevations at the e
Page 139 and 140:
Services and Reclamation will deter
Page 141 and 142:
For cumulative net inflow values be
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 8.8. UKL elevations at the e
Page 145 and 146:
Figure 8.10. UKL elevations at the
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 8.12. UKL elevations at the
Page 149 and 150:
natural and man-caused changes in i
Page 151 and 152:
Table 8.1 UKL end-of-month surface
Page 153 and 154:
UKL. Based on best available inform
Page 155 and 156:
larvae in UKL. Annual production of
Page 157 and 158:
Table 8.5 UKL end-of-month elevatio
Page 159 and 160:
Based on our review of the literatu
Page 161 and 162:
into the Pelican Bay water quality
Page 163 and 164:
We assume that UKL surface elevatio
Page 165 and 166:
vary by several orders of magnitude
Page 167 and 168:
survival rates, we know that some o
Page 169 and 170:
populations, and contains the large
Page 171 and 172:
8.3.5.1 Effects to Adult Sucker Spa
Page 173 and 174:
Table 8.8 Clear Lake surface elevat
Page 175 and 176:
occur, especially in the west lobe.
Page 177 and 178:
Table 8.9 End of the month surface
Page 179 and 180:
8.3.7.4 Effects of Entrainment Loss
Page 181 and 182:
The source of the sediment is unkno
Page 183 and 184:
period when they migrate upstream t
Page 185 and 186:
limited LRS and SNS persistence in
Page 187 and 188:
term and localized and because fish
Page 189 and 190:
8.5.1 Canal Salvage Reclamation pro
Page 191 and 192:
high predation rates and failure of
Page 193 and 194:
include the Klamath Basin Rangeland
Page 195 and 196:
Figure 9.1 Designated CHUs for the
Page 197 and 198:
These are discussed in greater deta
Page 199 and 200:
The proposed action will have no ef
Page 201 and 202:
No other spawning habitat exists be
Page 203 and 204:
consulted on. Current monitoring da
Page 205 and 206:
proposed action and this PCE suppor
Page 207 and 208:
Because of a multi-decade lack of r
Page 209 and 210:
Adverse effects of the proposed act
Page 211 and 212:
that juvenile survival is most like
Page 213 and 214:
elocation effort in Lake Ewauna to
Page 215 and 216:
LRS and SNS population resiliency o
Page 217 and 218:
stratum 4 (Interior Klamath) in whi
Page 219 and 220:
Pacific salmonids Oncorhynchus spp.
Page 221 and 222:
scenario, actions and elements of t
Page 223 and 224:
flow prescriptions should mimic pro
Page 225 and 226:
11.2.1 Current Condition of Critica
Page 227 and 228:
11.2.2 Factors Affecting SONCC Coho
Page 229 and 230:
e disoriented or displaced downstre
Page 231 and 232:
enhancement, and rehabilitative act
Page 233 and 234:
Water Temperature Sedimentation Org
Page 235 and 236:
Figure 11.1 Longitudinal and season
Page 237 and 238:
functioning floodplains that fail t
Page 239 and 240:
downstream of IGD, (2) enhance coho
Page 241 and 242:
few local ranchers and water distri
Page 243 and 244:
in some tributaries, access to and
Page 245 and 246:
11.3.7 Summary of Critical Habitat
Page 247 and 248:
these two time periods, the effects
Page 249 and 250:
consists of approximately 29,000 ac
Page 251 and 252:
The PacifiCorp habitat conservation
Page 253 and 254:
IGD, or used in constructed habitat
Page 255 and 256:
estoration, watershed planning, sal
Page 257 and 258:
Table 11.4. Modeled suspended sedim
Page 259 and 260:
parasites Ceratomyxa shasta (causes
Page 261 and 262:
that become infected is estimated t
Page 263 and 264:
where snow water equivalent is proj
Page 265 and 266:
minimizing disease risks, the detai
Page 267 and 268:
Figure 11.4. Proposed action, histo
Page 269 and 270:
Figure 11.6. Proposed action weekly
Page 271 and 272:
Figure 11.9. Regression between EWA
Page 273 and 274:
Figure 11.11. Proposed action and o
Page 275 and 276:
Figure 11.12. Number of days per wa
Page 277 and 278:
Figure 11.14. Monthly coefficient o
Page 279 and 280:
IGD. The proposed action modeled da
Page 281 and 282:
The results from Table 11.7 indicat
Page 283 and 284:
likely to increase the quantity of
Page 285 and 286:
habitat decreases between the Shast
Page 287 and 288:
Table 11.9. Daily average mainstem
Page 289 and 290:
Table 11.10. Daily average mainstem
Page 291 and 292:
5% 3336 13176 27664 26168 30946 237
Page 293 and 294:
The proposed action results in agri
Page 295 and 296:
Figure 11.21. Monthly mean of daily
Page 297 and 298:
Riparian restoration projects will
Page 299 and 300:
expected to be typical riparian spe
Page 301 and 302:
Table 11.13. Annual percent of proj
Page 303 and 304:
esource needs as they grow, and 3)
Page 305 and 306:
11.5.2 Klamath River Basin Adjudica
Page 307 and 308:
coho salmon within the Klamath Rive
Page 309 and 310:
aspects of a natural flow regime th
Page 311 and 312:
element of coho salmon critical hab
Page 313 and 314:
12.1.1.1 Risk Analyses for Endanger
Page 315 and 316:
ESU DIVERSITY STRATA POPULATIONS IN
Page 317 and 318:
eproduction, and distribution. The
Page 319 and 320:
Figure 12.2. Historic population st
Page 321 and 322:
the average ratio of IP-km to total
Page 323 and 324:
Although long-term data on coho sal
Page 325 and 326:
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
Page 327 and 328:
maintain viable abundances in many
Page 329 and 330:
12.2.5.5 Viability Summary Though p
Page 331 and 332:
coastal currents and upwelling, kno
Page 333 and 334:
12.2.6.2 Marine Derived Nutrients M
Page 335 and 336:
fisheries south of Cape Falcon, Ore
Page 337 and 338:
12.3 Environmental Baseline of Coho
Page 339 and 340:
water temperatures up to 19 ºC in
Page 341 and 342:
some coho salmon smolts may stop mi
Page 343 and 344:
threshold, all Klamath River coho s
Page 345 and 346:
abundance threshold (Table 12.3). T
Page 347 and 348:
mainstem Klamath and Trinity rivers
Page 349 and 350:
Although there are risks to Klamath
Page 351 and 352:
activities are generally beneficial
Page 353 and 354:
12.4 Effects to Individuals The pro
Page 355 and 356:
12.4.1.2 Response 12.4.1.2.1 Adults
Page 357 and 358:
(2012) believes is representative o
Page 359 and 360:
genotype II density of 5 spores/L w
Page 361 and 362:
flows provide a limit to the increa
Page 363 and 364:
polychaete and sediment disturbance
Page 365 and 366:
which will likely result in a relat
Page 367 and 368:
etween Trees of Heaven (RM 172) and
Page 369 and 370:
action. Reclamation estimated that
Page 371 and 372:
Based on literature, increased comp
Page 373 and 374:
Table 12.6. Summary of risks result
Page 375 and 376:
most juveniles. Stream flow diversi
Page 377 and 378:
at most fish relocation sites, base
Page 379 and 380:
higher, the minimally increased sed
Page 381 and 382:
Small pulses of moderately turbid w
Page 383 and 384:
Boulder faces in the deflector stru
Page 385 and 386:
conditions may fail if those condit
Page 387 and 388:
Adverse effects of the proposed act
Page 389 and 390:
Potential Stressor Habitat Reductio
Page 391 and 392:
Potential Stressor Elevated water t
Page 393 and 394:
12.6.2 Effects of fitness consequen
Page 395 and 396:
13 INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT Sectio
Page 397 and 398:
Table 13.1 Summary of maximum annua
Page 399 and 400:
in fewer larvae and juveniles, and
Page 401 and 402:
Table 13.2 Estimated annual maximum
Page 403 and 404:
1.2.1.8. Incidental Take Caused by
Page 405 and 406:
characteristics of aquatic species,
Page 407 and 408:
Table 13.5 Expected annual Environm
Page 409 and 410:
Cause of Incidental Take Habitat Re
Page 411 and 412:
Clear Lake, Gerber Reservoir, and T
Page 413 and 414:
This term and condition is requirin
Page 415 and 416:
13.4 Mandatory Monitoring and Repor
Page 417 and 418:
Required hydrologic monitoring incl
Page 419 and 420:
Table 13.7. Summary of LRS and SNS
Page 421 and 422:
T&C or Mandatory Monitoring Mandato
Page 423 and 424:
Table 13.9 Summary of reporting and
Page 425 and 426:
Table 13.10 Summary of meetings req
Page 427 and 428:
the above QA/QC procedures describe
Page 429 and 430:
Barry, P.M., E.C. Janney, D.A. Hewi
Page 431 and 432:
Burdick, S.M. and J. Rasmussen. 201
Page 433 and 434:
Dunsmoor, L., L. Basdekas, B. Wood,
Page 435 and 436:
Garen, D. 2011, Upper Klamath Basin
Page 437 and 438:
Janney, E.C., B.S. Hayes, D.A. Hewi
Page 439 and 440:
Laenen, A., and A.P. LeTourneau. 19
Page 441 and 442:
Miller, R.R., and G.R. Smith. 1981.
Page 443 and 444:
Perkins, D.L., and G.G. Scoppettone
Page 445 and 446:
(Deltistes luxatus) in Tule and Cle
Page 447 and 448:
Terwilliger, M. 2006. Physical habi
Page 449 and 450:
USBR [U.S. Bureau of Reclamation].
Page 451 and 452:
Williams, J.E. 2000. Chapter 13. Th
Page 453 and 454:
Arthington, A.H., S.E. Bunn, N.L. P
Page 455 and 456:
Beeman, J., S. Juhnke, G. Stutzer a
Page 457 and 458: Brommer, J.E. 2000. The evolution o
Page 459 and 460: Department of the Army Regional Gen
Page 461 and 462: Chilcote, M. W. 2003. Relationship
Page 463 and 464: Dunsmoor LK, and Huntington CW. 200
Page 465 and 466: Foott, J.S., R. Stone, E. Wiseman,
Page 467 and 468: Habera, J.W., R.J. Strange, B.D. Ca
Page 469 and 470: Hemstreet, T. 2013. Electronic mail
Page 471 and 472: Jordan, M. S. 2012. Hydraulic predi
Page 473 and 474: Kostow, K. E., A. R. Marshall and S
Page 475 and 476: MacFarlane, R. B., S. Hayes, and B.
Page 477 and 478: Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland Fishes of
Page 479 and 480: PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Pr
Page 481 and 482: Oregon Department of Environmental
Page 483 and 484: Puckridge, J. T., F. Sheldon, K. F.
Page 485 and 486: Ring, T.E. and B. Watson. 1999. Eff
Page 487 and 488: Sommer, T. R., M. L. Nobriga, W. C.
Page 489 and 490: Taylor, R. 1991. A review of local
Page 491 and 492: USFWS [U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv
Page 493 and 494: Ward G, and Armstrong N. 2010. Asse
Page 495 and 496: Winker, K., J. H. Rappole, and M. A
Page 497 and 498: 77 FR 476. National Marine Fisherie
Page 499 and 500: UKL Elevation (feet) Active Storage
Page 505 and 506: 16.2 Appendix B: Elevation Flow Dat
Page 507: 490
Page 511 and 512: Week of Water Year 1992 1993 1994 1
Page 527 and 528: Water Year October November Decembe
Page 533 and 534: 16.3 Appendix C: Description of Res
Page 535 and 536: 4. Removal of Small Dams (permanent
Page 537 and 538: Information regarding consideration
Page 539 and 540: 9. Piping Ditches a. Project Descri
Page 541 and 542: . Site-Specific Restrictions Restri
Page 543 and 544: 6. Protection Measures The followin
Page 545 and 546: to enter or be placed where they co
Page 547 and 548: shall be distributed throughout the
Page 549 and 550: weed free straw, silt fences) are i
Page 551 and 552: the project is located, and compris
Page 553 and 554: 2. Post Construction Monitoring and
Page 555 and 556: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
Page 557 and 558: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
Page 559 and 560:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
Page 561 and 562:
Page 563 and 564:
Page 565 and 566:
Page 567 and 568:
Page 569 and 570:
Page 571 and 572:
Page 573 and 574:
Page 575 and 576:
Page 577 and 578:
Page 579 and 580:
Page 581 and 582:
Page 583 and 584:
Page 585 and 586:
Page 587 and 588:
Page 589 and 590:
Page 591 and 592:
Median Seasonal Net Inflow (acre-fe
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
16.5 Appendix E: Observed and Model
Page 599 and 600:
Observed and modeled proposed actio
Page 601 and 602:
Observed and modeled proposed actio
Page 603 and 604:
16.6 Appendix F: Analyzing the rela
Page 605 and 606:
Table 1. Paired comparison of the c
Page 607:
Table 3. The difference in the mean
show all

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?