22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 1.1. Listed species and critical habitats considered in this document. .................................. 1<br />

Table 2.1 Chronology <strong>of</strong> Agency Coordination Team meetings for development <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Reclamation</strong>’s proposed action. .............................................................................................. 5<br />

Table 4.1 UKL flood release threshold elevations for the last day <strong>of</strong> each month under relatively<br />

dry or wet conditions. ........................................................................................................... 11<br />

Table 4.2. Williamson River proportion targeted for release at Link River Dam. ....................... 19<br />

Table 4.3. UKL fill rate adjustment factor. ................................................................................... 20<br />

Table 4.4 Net accretion below Link River Dam adjustment factor. ............................................. 21<br />

Table 4.5. Calculation <strong>of</strong> fall/winter Link River Dam target releases. ......................................... 22<br />

Table 4.6. Fall/winter water management summary. .................................................................... 23<br />

Table 4.7. UKL end <strong>of</strong> September elevation modeling objectives based on March50Volume.... 27<br />

Table 4.8. Environmental Water Account based on UKL Supply. ............................................... 28<br />

Table 4.9. Proposed minimum spring/summer Iron Gate Dam target flows (cfs). ....................... 28<br />

Table 4.10. July, August, and September Iron Gate Dam maximum flow targets. ...................... 31<br />

Table 4.11. Monthly maximum Lower Klamath NWR delivery and Upper Klamath Lake<br />

elevation thresholds. ............................................................................................................. 36<br />

Table 4.12. Proposed action model summary output results. ....................................................... 36<br />

Table 4.13. Proposed minimum Tule Lake Sump 1A elevations (<strong>Reclamation</strong> datum). ............. 39<br />

Table 7.1. Estimated LRS and SNS adult sucker population sizes. Note: The estimate for UKL<br />

is based on Hewitt et al. (2012). Clear Lake and Gerber Reservoir contain self-sustaining<br />

sucker populations. The “Other Areas” include Keno Reservoir, Tule Lake, Lost River, and<br />

four Klamath River reservoirs downstream <strong>of</strong> Keno that are considered sink populations. 60<br />

Table 7.2 Impaired water bodies within the action area (USDOI and CDFG 2012; Table 3.2-8).<br />

............................................................................................................................................... 70<br />

Table 7.3 Seasonal comparisons <strong>of</strong> potential threats to LRS and SNS in UKL from water quality<br />

parameters, including microcystin. ....................................................................................... 72<br />

Table 7.4 Estimated external phosphorus loading to UKL from various sources (ODEQ 2002). 76<br />

Table 7.5 Percent change in October through February median monthly flows in the Sprague and<br />

Williamson Rivers and net inflow to UKL, 1918 through 2012. .......................................... 81<br />

Table 7.6 Percent change in March through June median monthly flows in the Sprague and<br />

Williamson Rivers and net inflow to UKL, 1918 through 2012. .......................................... 82<br />

Table 7.7 Percent change in July through September median monthly flows in the Sprague and<br />

Williamson Rivers and net inflow to UKL, 1918 through 2012. .......................................... 83<br />

Table 7.8 Percent change in water year median monthly flows in the Sprague and Williamson<br />

Rivers and net inflow to UKL, 1918 through 2012. ............................................................. 84<br />

Table 7.9 Threats to the LRS and the SNS in UKL. ..................................................................... 98<br />

Table 7.10 Clear Lake elevation exceedances February through May. POR =1903-2012.<br />

(<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012 BA, Table 6-3). .................................................................................... 106<br />

Table 7.11 Gerber Reservoir elevation exceedances, February through May. POR = 1925-2012<br />

(<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012, Table 6-4). .......................................................................................... 108<br />

Table 7.12 September 30th Gerber Reservoir elevation exceedances 1925-2012 (<strong>Reclamation</strong><br />

2012, Table 6-4). ................................................................................................................. 109<br />

Table 8.1 UKL end-<strong>of</strong>-month surface elevations in ft for the POR water years 1981 through<br />

2011, based on KBPM modeling <strong>of</strong> the proposed action (<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012, Table 7-1). 134<br />

vii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!