22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 11.12. Number <strong>of</strong> days per water year that exhibit daily flow changes <strong>of</strong> 30 cfs or higher for the<br />

proposed action and Observed IGD daily discharge.<br />

In water years 1994 and 2005, the observed IGD discharge exhibits daily variability <strong>of</strong> 30 cfs or<br />

higher for a larger number <strong>of</strong> days. However, in these years, the variability demonstrated in the<br />

observed daily discharge is <strong>of</strong>ten a result <strong>of</strong> management decisions and is unrepresentative <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrologic conditions, as evidenced by the Williamson River hydrograph in water year 1994<br />

(Figure 11.13). The Williamson River is a reasonable indicator <strong>of</strong> hydrologic conditions in the<br />

upper Klamath Basin. Although affected by water diversions above UKL by <strong>of</strong>f-project water<br />

users in the spring and summer, the Williamson River still maintains a very strong correlation<br />

with UKL net inflow (Garen 2011). Water year 1994 is one <strong>of</strong> the driest years on record and yet<br />

the observed IGD flows were highest during the October through January period when the<br />

Williamson River was at base flow (Figure 11.13). Observed flows at IGD from March through<br />

June 1994 were among the lowest flows <strong>of</strong> the year, whereas observed flows at the Williamson<br />

River indicate this time period is when flows should be highest. In water year 1994, the greatest<br />

variability and some <strong>of</strong> the highest flows in the observed IGD discharge occur in the summer<br />

months when Williamson River flows are receding to base flow and natural variability is<br />

minimal (Figure 11.13). The proposed action hydrograph more accurately represents natural<br />

hydrologic conditions as it more closely mimics the shape and relative magnitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Williamson River hydrograph (Figures 11.13 and 11.15). Proposed action flows are dictated by<br />

daily calculations based on hydrologic indicators in the basin including the Williamson River.<br />

Although the proposed action has less daily flow changes <strong>of</strong> 30 cfs or higher than the observed<br />

flows in 1994, the variability coincides with changing hydrologic conditions and is more<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> the Klamath River natural flow regime, which is beneficial to coho salmon<br />

(Figure 11.13).<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!