22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8.5. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> February (kaf = thousand acre-feet).<br />

In February, water years 1982, 1993, and 2006 are considered outliers because the UKL<br />

elevation was less than expected for the cumulative inflow in those years, based on threshold<br />

shown in Figure 8.5. Circumstances for these years were similar to those described for January.<br />

In similar situations during implementation <strong>of</strong> the proposed action, <strong>Reclamation</strong> will consult<br />

with the Services regarding reasons for the lower than anticipated UKL elevations. The Services<br />

and <strong>Reclamation</strong> will determine if UKL is on a trajectory to fill later in the winter, based on<br />

current and forecasted conditions or if adaptive management actions must be taken. Therefore, if<br />

the cumulative net inflow to UKL since October 1 is greater than 550,000 acre-feet, no threshold<br />

applies if the Services and <strong>Reclamation</strong> agree that UKL is on a trajectory to fill later in the<br />

winter, or adaptive management actions will result in sufficient UKL elevations in the spring.<br />

For cumulative net inflow values less than 362,000 acre-feet since October 1, the minimum UKL<br />

elevation is 4,141.07 ft (1,262.20 m).<br />

For cumulative net inflow values between 362,000 and 447,000 acre-feet, the equation<br />

determining the UKL elevation threshold = 0.006125x + 4138.8493 where x = the cumulative<br />

net inflow into UKL since October 1 in thousand acre-feet.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!