22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.3.7 Summary <strong>of</strong> Critical Habitat in Interior-Klamath Diversity Stratum<br />

The current function <strong>of</strong> critical habitat in the Interior-Klamath Diversity Stratum is degraded<br />

relative to its unimpaired state. Sedimentation, low stream flows, poor water quality, stream<br />

habitat simplification, and habitat loss from poorly designed road crossings plague coho salmon<br />

streams in this stratum. Additionally, critical habitat in the Interior Diversity stratum <strong>of</strong>ten lacks<br />

the ability to establish essential features due to ongoing human activities. Water use in many<br />

regions throughout the diversity stratum (e.g., Shasta and Scott rivers) reduces summer base<br />

flows, which limits the establishment <strong>of</strong> several essential features such as water quantity and<br />

water quality.<br />

11.3.8 Factors Affecting Coho Salmon Critical Habitat in the Action Area<br />

11.3.8.1 <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s Klamath Project<br />

11.3.8.1.1 Hydrologic Alteration<br />

The <strong>Reclamation</strong> Act <strong>of</strong> 1902 (43 U.S.C. 391 et seq.) authorized the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior to<br />

locate, construct, operate, and maintain works for the storage, diversion, and development <strong>of</strong><br />

water for the reclamation <strong>of</strong> arid and semiarid lands in the western States. Congress facilitated<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the Klamath Project by authorizing the Secretary to raise or lower the level <strong>of</strong><br />

Lower Klamath and Tule Lakes and to dispose <strong>of</strong> the land uncovered by such operation for use<br />

under the <strong>Reclamation</strong> Act <strong>of</strong> 1902. The Oregon and California legislatures passed legislation<br />

for certain aspects <strong>of</strong> the Klamath Project, and the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior authorized<br />

construction May 15, 1905, in accordance with the <strong>Reclamation</strong> Act <strong>of</strong> 1902 (Act <strong>of</strong> February 9,<br />

1905, Ch. 567, 33 Stat. 714). The Project was authorized to drain and reclaim lakebed lands in<br />

Lower Klamath and Tule Lakes, to store water <strong>of</strong> the Upper Klamath and Lost Rivers, including<br />

water in the Lower Klamath and Tule Lakes, to divert and deliver supplies for Project purposes,<br />

and to control flooding <strong>of</strong> the reclaimed lands.<br />

Starting around 1912, construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the numerous facilities associated with<br />

<strong>Reclamation</strong>’s Klamath Project significantly altered the natural hydrographs <strong>of</strong> the upper and<br />

lower Klamath River. In 1922, the level <strong>of</strong> Upper Klamath Lake was raised by the Link River<br />

dam. <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s Klamath Project now consists <strong>of</strong> an extensive system <strong>of</strong> canals, pumps,<br />

diversion structures, and dams capable <strong>of</strong> routing water to approximately 200,000 ac (81,000 ha)<br />

<strong>of</strong> irrigated farmlands in the upper Klamath Basin (<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012).<br />

Hecht and Kamman (1996) analyzed the hydrologic records for similar water years (pre- and<br />

post-Project) at several locations. The authors concluded that the timing <strong>of</strong> peak and base flows<br />

changed significantly after construction <strong>of</strong> the Project, and that the operation increases flows in<br />

October and November and decreases flows in the late spring and summer as measured at Keno,<br />

Seiad, and Klamath USGS gage sites. Their report also noted that water diversions also occur in<br />

areas outside the Project boundaries. IGD was completed in 1962 to re-regulate flow releases<br />

from the Copco facilities. However, IGD did not restore the pre-Project hydrograph. Rather,<br />

base flows were altered. Fall flows were slightly increased while spring and summer flows were<br />

228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!