16.2.7 Observed Gerber Reservoir end <strong>of</strong> month surface elevations in feet (<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012). Water Year October November December January February March April May June July August September 2011 4,803.18 4,803.22 4,809.08 4,814.44 4,815.22 4,821.88 4,830.13 4,830.10 4,828.25 4,825.39 4,822.56 4,820.12 2010 4,812.24 4,812.07 4,812.80 4,813.34 4,815.24 4,816.12 4,817.79 4,817.46 4,815.30 4,811.40 4,807.20 4,803.28 2009 4,820.56 4,820.52 4,820.87 4,820.74 4,821.68 4,824.58 4,825.00 4,823.49 4,821.92 4,818.72 4,815.56 4,812.40 2008 4,819.80 4,819.81 4,819.96 4,820.37 4,820.65 4,826.60 4,831.86 4,830.70 4,828.98 4,826.18 4,823.33 4,820.81 2007 4,824.23 4,824.50 4,825.92 4,825.98 4,828.30 4,832.27 4,832.60 4,830.58 4,828.06 4,825.25 4,822.27 4,819.82 2006 4,807.44 4,809.23 4,820.64 4,826.60 4,831.32 4,835.88 4,836.22 4,834.60 4,832.57 4,829.76 4,827.06 4,824.57 2005 4,805.69 4,805.68 4,808.30 4,808.30 4,810.72 4,812.04 4,813.94 4,821.27 4,819.14 4,815.37 4,811.34 4,807.54 2004 4,808.25 4,808.28 4,808.99 4,810.41 4,815.39 4,822.44 4,822.33 4,820.15 4,817.26 4,813.52 4,809.36 4,805.98 2003 4,808.26 4,808.35 4,809.26 4,813.21 4,814.12 4,816.69 4,821.17 4,822.45 4,819.08 4,815.40 4,811.83 4,808.61 2002 4,810.59 4,810.86 4,811.35 4,816.32 4,818.32 4,822.69 4,824.50 4,822.84 4,819.76 4,816.10 4,812.30 4,808.50 2001 4,823.07 4,823.13 4,823.19 4,823.21 4,823.41 4,825.38 4,825.75 4,823.01 4,819.96 4,816.85 4,813.28 4,810.87 2000 4,823.80 4,823.56 4,823.68 4,825.50 4,828.48 4,832.54 4,835.00 4,833.46 4,830.73 4,827.98 4,825.11 4,823.40 1999 4,827.45 4,829.68 4,830.94 4,832.38 4,830.70 4,831.14 4,834.24 4,833.97 4,831.84 4,828.83 4,826.20 4,823.80 1998 4,824.40 4,824.42 4,824.56 4,830.82 4,833.76 4,836.19 4,835.65 4,836.29 4,835.16 4,832.68 4,830.39 4,828.00 1997 4,826.18 4,826.60 4,834.60 4,834.18 4,834.10 4,835.56 4,835.55 4,833.64 4,831.62 4,828.96 4,826.51 4,824.36 1996 4,825.39 4,825.40 4,827.50 4,829.67 4,835.04 4,835.88 4,835.83 4,835.72 4,833.54 4,830.97 4,828.42 4,826.36 1995 4,806.59 4,806.74 4,807.08 4,816.63 4,822.02 4,832.16 4,835.91 4,835.13 4,833.88 4,831.16 4,828.27 4,825.70 1994 4,821.96 4,821.96 4,822.20 4,822.32 4,822.94 4,823.30 4,822.48 4,820.80 4,817.81 4,814.08 4,810.16 4,806.78 1993 4,796.62 4,796.62 4,797.06 4,798.79 4,802.24 4,828.00 4,831.92 4,830.34 4,829.60 4,826.84 4,824.49 4,822.04 1992 4,797.98 4,797.96 4,798.04 4,798.18 4,800.74 4,801.28 4,801.14 4,798.86 4,798.36 4,797.73 4,797.01 4,796.52 1991 4,804.38 4,804.32 4,804.40 4,804.54 4,804.82 4,804.18 4,808.26 4,808.10 4,803.60 4,799.22 4,798.60 4,798.08 1990 4,815.18 4,815.16 4,815.20 4,816.58 4,817.48 4,821.33 4,821.20 4,818.94 4,816.12 4,812.25 4,808.70 4,804.56 1989 4,802.20 4,803.98 4,804.30 4,804.40 4,805.42 4,826.42 4,828.66 4,827.00 4,824.18 4,820.81 4,818.00 4,815.26 1988 4,813.24 4,813.18 4,813.54 4,814.00 4,815.80 4,819.12 4,819.53 4,817.53 4,815.00 4,810.95 4,806.90 4,802.40 1987 4,822.95 4,822.88 4,823.00 4,823.10 4,824.78 4,827.90 4,827.18 4,824.65 4,822.30 4,819.68 4,816.32 4,813.47 1986 4,823.47 4,823.51 4,823.58 4,825.91 4,834.07 4,835.60 4,834.93 4,833.32 4,830.58 4,827.68 4,824.54 4,823.10 1985 4,825.85 4,828.12 4,828.50 4,828.37 4,828.90 4,833.88 4,835.49 4,833.58 4,830.98 4,827.95 4,824.90 4,823.62 1984 4,826.26 4,826.92 4,826.82 4,824.64 4,826.50 4,836.19 4,835.80 4,834.85 4,833.15 4,830.25 4,827.68 4,825.48 1983 4,826.07 4,826.31 4,827.60 4,829.55 4,830.90 4,834.40 4,836.48 4,835.04 4,833.18 4,830.95 4,828.88 4,826.88 1982 4,804.44 4,811.50 4,821.60 4,822.20 4,833.50 4,835.85 4,835.90 4,834.58 4,832.76 4,830.70 4,827.94 4,825.93 1981 4,814.15 4,814.18 4,814.68 4,814.80 4,818.00 4,820.82 4,821.40 4,819.10 4,816.20 4,812.40 4,807.98 4,804.24 1980 4,805.72 4,807.30 4,809.00 4,817.26 4,824.18 4,826.15 4,827.05 4,825.00 4,822.80 4,819.80 4,816.50 4,814.23 513
Water Year October November December January February March April May June July August September 1979 4,815.44 4,815.46 4,815.47 4,816.82 4,817.82 4,822.06 4,822.00 4,820.18 4,816.46 4,812.30 4,809.00 4,805.64 1978 4,802.42 4,804.40 4,809.17 4,816.38 4,819.01 4,824.76 4,828.17 4,827.00 4,824.10 4,821.08 4,817.98 4,815.70 1977 4,817.45 4,817.36 4,817.40 4,817.40 4,817.50 4,817.70 4,816.52 4,815.17 4,812.14 4,807.90 4,804.12 4,802.50 1976 4,822.66 4,822.80 4,823.63 4,823.70 4,824.69 4,828.38 4,830.25 4,827.30 4,824.52 4,821.15 4,820.48 4,817.76 1975 4,820.08 4,820.10 4,820.49 4,820.68 4,821.34 4,825.47 4,833.58 4,834.87 4,831.68 4,828.62 4,825.58 4,822.70 1974 4,812.98 4,815.62 4,820.00 4,824.17 4,824.77 4,833.27 4,834.84 4,832.90 4,829.73 4,827.04 4,823.89 4,820.76 1973 4,821.20 4,821.43 4,822.99 4,824.02 4,825.56 4,828.32 4,829.26 4,826.56 4,823.14 4,819.34 4,815.46 4,813.05 1972 4,824.20 4,824.41 4,824.70 4,826.55 4,833.04 4,835.07 4,835.50 4,833.15 4,830.22 4,826.68 4,823.39 4,821.22 1971 4,821.49 4,823.04 4,825.39 4,829.46 4,831.46 4,834.49 4,835.50 4,834.86 4,832.96 4,830.21 4,826.94 4,824.38 1970 4,821.80 4,821.81 4,824.60 4,832.08 4,832.03 4,835.00 4,834.59 4,832.57 4,830.03 4,826.78 4,823.64 4,821.63 1969 4,809.20 4,809.74 4,811.45 4,813.95 4,815.95 4,821.84 4,834.39 4,832.56 4,830.70 4,827.56 4,824.29 4,822.06 1968 4,820.62 4,820.50 4,820.62 4,820.85 4,825.65 4,825.91 4,824.71 4,822.84 4,819.52 4,815.48 4,812.90 4,809.64 1967 4,814.62 4,815.24 4,817.83 4,818.90 4,821.25 4,826.07 4,829.68 4,832.07 4,829.70 4,826.50 4,823.32 4,820.88 1966 4,822.70 4,822.83 4,822.85 4,823.14 4,823.21 4,828.30 4,828.94 4,826.32 4,823.91 4,820.80 4,817.50 4,815.38 1965 4,816.58 4,816.85 4,831.40 4,829.70 4,829.02 4,831.75 4,833.95 4,831.70 4,830.00 4,826.76 4,825.00 4,822.90 1964 4,817.26 4,817.57 4,817.66 4,818.10 4,818.12 4,818.80 4,827.70 4,825.90 4,826.10 4,822.70 4,819.70 4,817.20 1963 4,809.67 4,810.50 4,814.38 4,814.80 4,819.92 4,821.30 4,827.30 4,828.00 4,825.45 4,822.65 4,819.65 4,817.90 1962 4,794.27 4,795.93 4,798.80 4,799.14 4,803.80 4,809.00 4,818.87 4,817.47 4,814.10 4,809.85 4,805.60 4,801.05 1961 4,796.53 4,797.17 4,801.25 4,802.34 4,807.64 4,811.30 4,812.37 4,810.35 4,807.88 4,804.13 4,801.24 4,794.47 1960 4,801.01 4,800.56 4,800.52 4,800.64 4,805.36 4,813.50 4,815.07 4,815.26 4,811.74 4,806.92 4,802.52 4,796.98 1959 4,820.80 4,820.64 4,820.63 4,821.71 4,822.74 4,824.22 4,822.88 4,820.35 4,815.76 4,810.25 4,805.51 4,802.16 1958 4,821.05 4,822.75 4,825.00 4,821.05 4,822.75 4,825.00 4,825.70 4,834.82 4,833.38 4,835.30 4,833.25 4,831.24 1957 4,820.82 4,821.46 4,823.06 4,823.20 4,829.65 4,833.55 4,834.97 4,834.30 4,830.92 4,827.06 4,823.30 4,820.52 1956 4,803.38 4,804.90 4,821.50 4,825.57 4,823.44 4,830.74 4,832.32 4,832.90 4,830.30 4,826.72 4,823.39 4,820.62 1955 4,814.20 4,814.29 4,814.27 4,814.39 4,814.46 4,818.07 4,821.42 4,819.47 4,815.51 4,811.38 4,816.58 4,804.02 1954 4,822.00 4,822.81 4,822.29 4,821.03 4,823.05 4,829.63 4,831.64 4,828.39 4,825.88 4,821.68 4,817.84 4,815.25 1953 4,818.87 4,818.77 4,819.24 4,825.25 4,827.08 4,830.77 4,831.94 4,833.07 4,832.19 4,828.25 4,824.84 4,822.62 1952 4,810.49 4,810.77 4,812.26 4,812.75 4,811.60 4,813.97 4,831.86 4,830.96 4,828.60 4,825.34 4,821.99 4,819.66 1951 4,806.57 4,807.41 4,813.10 4,813.56 4,820.09 4,824.98 4,825.72 4,825.24 4,821.44 4,817.19 4,813.65 4,810.44 1950 4,806.88 4,806.92 4,807.03 4,809.10 4,814.13 4,819.88 4,823.04 4,820.98 4,818.00 4,813.14 4,809.01 4,806.31 1949 4,810.17 4,810.30 4,810.66 4,808.67 4,807.79 4,816.60 4,821.81 4,820.50 4,817.64 4,813.48 4,809.75 4,806.89 1948 4,808.31 4,808.35 4,808.46 4,811.72 4,812.74 4,815.11 4,819.50 4,820.47 4,818.88 4,815.14 4,812.07 4,810.33 514
- Page 1 and 2:
National Marine Fisheries Service U
- Page 3 and 4:
7.4.5 LRS and SNS Population Dynami
- Page 5 and 6:
11.1.5 Critical Assumptions .......
- Page 7 and 8:
16 APPENDICIES ....................
- Page 9 and 10:
Table 8.2 UKL end-of-month elevatio
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1. The act
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 11.17. Coho salmon fry habit
- Page 15 and 16:
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Abbrevia
- Page 17 and 18:
Abbreviation/Acronym YTEP WDFW WRIM
- Page 19 and 20:
In 2001, the Services issued BiOps
- Page 21 and 22:
Findings of Fact and Order of Deter
- Page 23 and 24:
proposed changes to the vegetation
- Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3.1. The action area for Rec
- Page 27 and 28:
4 PROPOSED ACTION Reclamation propo
- Page 29 and 30:
4.2 Element Two Operate the Project
- Page 31 and 32:
October 1 and March 1. The proposed
- Page 33 and 34:
Reclamation incorporated the 1981 t
- Page 35 and 36:
Provide Project irrigation deliveri
- Page 37 and 38:
Table 4.3. UKL fill rate adjustment
- Page 39 and 40:
Table 4.5. Calculation of fall/wint
- Page 41 and 42:
Flows below IGD are ultimately the
- Page 43 and 44:
The EWA, Project Supply, and UKL Re
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 4.8. Environmental Water Acco
- Page 47 and 48:
eleases somewhat on the ascending l
- Page 49 and 50:
fish disease, die off, entrainment,
- Page 51 and 52:
acre-feet when the Project Supply c
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 4.11. Monthly maximum Lower K
- Page 55 and 56:
4.2.4 Ramp-Down Rates at Iron Gate
- Page 57 and 58:
progresses and EWA volumes are upda
- Page 59 and 60:
O&M activities are carried out eith
- Page 61 and 62:
1. The A Canal has six headgates th
- Page 63 and 64:
Therefore, Reclamation proposes to
- Page 65 and 66:
coordinate with the NMFS to develop
- Page 67 and 68:
the confluence with Omogar Creek at
- Page 69 and 70:
though several major improvements t
- Page 71 and 72:
Sucker larvae transform into age-0
- Page 73 and 74:
units: (1) Clear Lake; (2) Tule Lak
- Page 75 and 76:
Figure 7.2. Adult spawning populati
- Page 77 and 78:
Table 7.1. Estimated LRS and SNS ad
- Page 79 and 80:
1905, Ch. 567, 33 Stat. 714). The P
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 7.4 Modeled April through No
- Page 83 and 84:
7.9.2 Klamath Basin The Oregon Clim
- Page 85 and 86:
A change in mean precipitation rang
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 7.2 Impaired water bodies wit
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 7.3 Seasonal comparisons of p
- Page 91 and 92:
ammonia that is lethal to 50 percen
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 7.4 Estimated external phosph
- Page 95 and 96:
examination of juvenile suckers fro
- Page 97 and 98:
Evaluation of baseline hydrology in
- Page 99 and 100:
2012 1931 through 2012 12.6% 0.24 5
- Page 101 and 102:
The overall water year trend (Table
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 7.7 Sprague River trends, wa
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 7.9 Sprague River trends, wa
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 7.12 Williamson River trends
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 7.14 UKL trends, water years
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 7.17 UKL: net inflow departu
- Page 113 and 114:
7.10.3.3 Competition and Predation
- Page 115 and 116:
By late July, surviving larval suck
- Page 117 and 118:
Threat Nature of Threat Life Stage
- Page 119 and 120:
2011) and increased adult spawning
- Page 121 and 122:
Based on the best available informa
- Page 123 and 124:
contrast, water levels began 1.5 ft
- Page 125 and 126:
evaporation and seepage estimated a
- Page 127 and 128:
prolonged low oxygen conditions if
- Page 129 and 130:
The April through September 4,034.6
- Page 131 and 132:
8 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ON LOST RIV
- Page 133 and 134:
Although the volume of Project wate
- Page 135 and 136:
than 1 m), and fitting one or more
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 8.3. UKL elevations at the e
- Page 139 and 140:
Services and Reclamation will deter
- Page 141 and 142:
For cumulative net inflow values be
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 8.8. UKL elevations at the e
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 8.10. UKL elevations at the
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 8.12. UKL elevations at the
- Page 149 and 150:
natural and man-caused changes in i
- Page 151 and 152:
Table 8.1 UKL end-of-month surface
- Page 153 and 154:
UKL. Based on best available inform
- Page 155 and 156:
larvae in UKL. Annual production of
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 8.5 UKL end-of-month elevatio
- Page 159 and 160:
Based on our review of the literatu
- Page 161 and 162:
into the Pelican Bay water quality
- Page 163 and 164:
We assume that UKL surface elevatio
- Page 165 and 166:
vary by several orders of magnitude
- Page 167 and 168:
survival rates, we know that some o
- Page 169 and 170:
populations, and contains the large
- Page 171 and 172:
8.3.5.1 Effects to Adult Sucker Spa
- Page 173 and 174:
Table 8.8 Clear Lake surface elevat
- Page 175 and 176:
occur, especially in the west lobe.
- Page 177 and 178:
Table 8.9 End of the month surface
- Page 179 and 180:
8.3.7.4 Effects of Entrainment Loss
- Page 181 and 182:
The source of the sediment is unkno
- Page 183 and 184:
period when they migrate upstream t
- Page 185 and 186:
limited LRS and SNS persistence in
- Page 187 and 188:
term and localized and because fish
- Page 189 and 190:
8.5.1 Canal Salvage Reclamation pro
- Page 191 and 192:
high predation rates and failure of
- Page 193 and 194:
include the Klamath Basin Rangeland
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 9.1 Designated CHUs for the
- Page 197 and 198:
These are discussed in greater deta
- Page 199 and 200:
The proposed action will have no ef
- Page 201 and 202:
No other spawning habitat exists be
- Page 203 and 204:
consulted on. Current monitoring da
- Page 205 and 206:
proposed action and this PCE suppor
- Page 207 and 208:
Because of a multi-decade lack of r
- Page 209 and 210:
Adverse effects of the proposed act
- Page 211 and 212:
that juvenile survival is most like
- Page 213 and 214:
elocation effort in Lake Ewauna to
- Page 215 and 216:
LRS and SNS population resiliency o
- Page 217 and 218:
stratum 4 (Interior Klamath) in whi
- Page 219 and 220:
Pacific salmonids Oncorhynchus spp.
- Page 221 and 222:
scenario, actions and elements of t
- Page 223 and 224:
flow prescriptions should mimic pro
- Page 225 and 226:
11.2.1 Current Condition of Critica
- Page 227 and 228:
11.2.2 Factors Affecting SONCC Coho
- Page 229 and 230:
e disoriented or displaced downstre
- Page 231 and 232:
enhancement, and rehabilitative act
- Page 233 and 234:
Water Temperature Sedimentation Org
- Page 235 and 236:
Figure 11.1 Longitudinal and season
- Page 237 and 238:
functioning floodplains that fail t
- Page 239 and 240:
downstream of IGD, (2) enhance coho
- Page 241 and 242:
few local ranchers and water distri
- Page 243 and 244:
in some tributaries, access to and
- Page 245 and 246:
11.3.7 Summary of Critical Habitat
- Page 247 and 248:
these two time periods, the effects
- Page 249 and 250:
consists of approximately 29,000 ac
- Page 251 and 252:
The PacifiCorp habitat conservation
- Page 253 and 254:
IGD, or used in constructed habitat
- Page 255 and 256:
estoration, watershed planning, sal
- Page 257 and 258:
Table 11.4. Modeled suspended sedim
- Page 259 and 260:
parasites Ceratomyxa shasta (causes
- Page 261 and 262:
that become infected is estimated t
- Page 263 and 264:
where snow water equivalent is proj
- Page 265 and 266:
minimizing disease risks, the detai
- Page 267 and 268:
Figure 11.4. Proposed action, histo
- Page 269 and 270:
Figure 11.6. Proposed action weekly
- Page 271 and 272:
Figure 11.9. Regression between EWA
- Page 273 and 274:
Figure 11.11. Proposed action and o
- Page 275 and 276:
Figure 11.12. Number of days per wa
- Page 277 and 278:
Figure 11.14. Monthly coefficient o
- Page 279 and 280:
IGD. The proposed action modeled da
- Page 281 and 282:
The results from Table 11.7 indicat
- Page 283 and 284:
likely to increase the quantity of
- Page 285 and 286:
habitat decreases between the Shast
- Page 287 and 288:
Table 11.9. Daily average mainstem
- Page 289 and 290:
Table 11.10. Daily average mainstem
- Page 291 and 292:
5% 3336 13176 27664 26168 30946 237
- Page 293 and 294:
The proposed action results in agri
- Page 295 and 296:
Figure 11.21. Monthly mean of daily
- Page 297 and 298:
Riparian restoration projects will
- Page 299 and 300:
expected to be typical riparian spe
- Page 301 and 302:
Table 11.13. Annual percent of proj
- Page 303 and 304:
esource needs as they grow, and 3)
- Page 305 and 306:
11.5.2 Klamath River Basin Adjudica
- Page 307 and 308:
coho salmon within the Klamath Rive
- Page 309 and 310:
aspects of a natural flow regime th
- Page 311 and 312:
element of coho salmon critical hab
- Page 313 and 314:
12.1.1.1 Risk Analyses for Endanger
- Page 315 and 316:
ESU DIVERSITY STRATA POPULATIONS IN
- Page 317 and 318:
eproduction, and distribution. The
- Page 319 and 320:
Figure 12.2. Historic population st
- Page 321 and 322:
the average ratio of IP-km to total
- Page 323 and 324:
Although long-term data on coho sal
- Page 325 and 326:
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
- Page 327 and 328:
maintain viable abundances in many
- Page 329 and 330:
12.2.5.5 Viability Summary Though p
- Page 331 and 332:
coastal currents and upwelling, kno
- Page 333 and 334:
12.2.6.2 Marine Derived Nutrients M
- Page 335 and 336:
fisheries south of Cape Falcon, Ore
- Page 337 and 338:
12.3 Environmental Baseline of Coho
- Page 339 and 340:
water temperatures up to 19 ºC in
- Page 341 and 342:
some coho salmon smolts may stop mi
- Page 343 and 344:
threshold, all Klamath River coho s
- Page 345 and 346:
abundance threshold (Table 12.3). T
- Page 347 and 348:
mainstem Klamath and Trinity rivers
- Page 349 and 350:
Although there are risks to Klamath
- Page 351 and 352:
activities are generally beneficial
- Page 353 and 354:
12.4 Effects to Individuals The pro
- Page 355 and 356:
12.4.1.2 Response 12.4.1.2.1 Adults
- Page 357 and 358:
(2012) believes is representative o
- Page 359 and 360:
genotype II density of 5 spores/L w
- Page 361 and 362:
flows provide a limit to the increa
- Page 363 and 364:
polychaete and sediment disturbance
- Page 365 and 366:
which will likely result in a relat
- Page 367 and 368:
etween Trees of Heaven (RM 172) and
- Page 369 and 370:
action. Reclamation estimated that
- Page 371 and 372:
Based on literature, increased comp
- Page 373 and 374:
Table 12.6. Summary of risks result
- Page 375 and 376:
most juveniles. Stream flow diversi
- Page 377 and 378:
at most fish relocation sites, base
- Page 379 and 380:
higher, the minimally increased sed
- Page 381 and 382:
Small pulses of moderately turbid w
- Page 383 and 384:
Boulder faces in the deflector stru
- Page 385 and 386:
conditions may fail if those condit
- Page 387 and 388:
Adverse effects of the proposed act
- Page 389 and 390:
Potential Stressor Habitat Reductio
- Page 391 and 392:
Potential Stressor Elevated water t
- Page 393 and 394:
12.6.2 Effects of fitness consequen
- Page 395 and 396:
13 INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT Sectio
- Page 397 and 398:
Table 13.1 Summary of maximum annua
- Page 399 and 400:
in fewer larvae and juveniles, and
- Page 401 and 402:
Table 13.2 Estimated annual maximum
- Page 403 and 404:
1.2.1.8. Incidental Take Caused by
- Page 405 and 406:
characteristics of aquatic species,
- Page 407 and 408:
Table 13.5 Expected annual Environm
- Page 409 and 410:
Cause of Incidental Take Habitat Re
- Page 411 and 412:
Clear Lake, Gerber Reservoir, and T
- Page 413 and 414:
This term and condition is requirin
- Page 415 and 416:
13.4 Mandatory Monitoring and Repor
- Page 417 and 418:
Required hydrologic monitoring incl
- Page 419 and 420:
Table 13.7. Summary of LRS and SNS
- Page 421 and 422:
T&C or Mandatory Monitoring Mandato
- Page 423 and 424:
Table 13.9 Summary of reporting and
- Page 425 and 426:
Table 13.10 Summary of meetings req
- Page 427 and 428:
the above QA/QC procedures describe
- Page 429 and 430:
Barry, P.M., E.C. Janney, D.A. Hewi
- Page 431 and 432:
Burdick, S.M. and J. Rasmussen. 201
- Page 433 and 434:
Dunsmoor, L., L. Basdekas, B. Wood,
- Page 435 and 436:
Garen, D. 2011, Upper Klamath Basin
- Page 437 and 438:
Janney, E.C., B.S. Hayes, D.A. Hewi
- Page 439 and 440:
Laenen, A., and A.P. LeTourneau. 19
- Page 441 and 442:
Miller, R.R., and G.R. Smith. 1981.
- Page 443 and 444:
Perkins, D.L., and G.G. Scoppettone
- Page 445 and 446:
(Deltistes luxatus) in Tule and Cle
- Page 447 and 448:
Terwilliger, M. 2006. Physical habi
- Page 449 and 450:
USBR [U.S. Bureau of Reclamation].
- Page 451 and 452:
Williams, J.E. 2000. Chapter 13. Th
- Page 453 and 454:
Arthington, A.H., S.E. Bunn, N.L. P
- Page 455 and 456:
Beeman, J., S. Juhnke, G. Stutzer a
- Page 457 and 458:
Brommer, J.E. 2000. The evolution o
- Page 459 and 460:
Department of the Army Regional Gen
- Page 461 and 462:
Chilcote, M. W. 2003. Relationship
- Page 463 and 464:
Dunsmoor LK, and Huntington CW. 200
- Page 465 and 466:
Foott, J.S., R. Stone, E. Wiseman,
- Page 467 and 468:
Habera, J.W., R.J. Strange, B.D. Ca
- Page 469 and 470:
Hemstreet, T. 2013. Electronic mail
- Page 471 and 472:
Jordan, M. S. 2012. Hydraulic predi
- Page 473 and 474:
Kostow, K. E., A. R. Marshall and S
- Page 475 and 476:
MacFarlane, R. B., S. Hayes, and B.
- Page 477 and 478:
Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland Fishes of
- Page 479 and 480: PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Pr
- Page 481 and 482: Oregon Department of Environmental
- Page 483 and 484: Puckridge, J. T., F. Sheldon, K. F.
- Page 485 and 486: Ring, T.E. and B. Watson. 1999. Eff
- Page 487 and 488: Sommer, T. R., M. L. Nobriga, W. C.
- Page 489 and 490: Taylor, R. 1991. A review of local
- Page 491 and 492: USFWS [U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv
- Page 493 and 494: Ward G, and Armstrong N. 2010. Asse
- Page 495 and 496: Winker, K., J. H. Rappole, and M. A
- Page 497 and 498: 77 FR 476. National Marine Fisherie
- Page 499 and 500: UKL Elevation (feet) Active Storage
- Page 501 and 502: UKL Elevation (feet) Active Storage
- Page 503 and 504: UKL Elevation (feet) Active Storage
- Page 505 and 506: 16.2 Appendix B: Elevation Flow Dat
- Page 507 and 508: 490
- Page 509 and 510: Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1
- Page 511 and 512: Week of Water Year 1992 1993 1994 1
- Page 513 and 514: Week of Water Year 2001 2002 2003 2
- Page 515 and 516: Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1
- Page 517 and 518: Week of Water Year 1998 1999 2000 2
- Page 519 and 520: Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1
- Page 521 and 522: Week of Water Year 1998 1999 2000 2
- Page 523 and 524: Week of Water Year 1981 1982 1983 1
- Page 525 and 526: Week of Water Year 1998 1999 2000 2
- Page 527 and 528: Water Year October November Decembe
- Page 529: Water Year October November Decembe
- Page 533 and 534: 16.3 Appendix C: Description of Res
- Page 535 and 536: 4. Removal of Small Dams (permanent
- Page 537 and 538: Information regarding consideration
- Page 539 and 540: 9. Piping Ditches a. Project Descri
- Page 541 and 542: . Site-Specific Restrictions Restri
- Page 543 and 544: 6. Protection Measures The followin
- Page 545 and 546: to enter or be placed where they co
- Page 547 and 548: shall be distributed throughout the
- Page 549 and 550: weed free straw, silt fences) are i
- Page 551 and 552: the project is located, and compris
- Page 553 and 554: 2. Post Construction Monitoring and
- Page 555 and 556: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 557 and 558: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 559 and 560: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 561 and 562: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 563 and 564: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 565 and 566: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 567 and 568: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 569 and 570: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 571 and 572: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 573 and 574: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 575 and 576: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 577 and 578: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 579 and 580: Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 581 and 582:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 583 and 584:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 585 and 586:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 587 and 588:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 589 and 590:
Median Seasonal Flow (acre-feet) Me
- Page 591 and 592:
Median Seasonal Net Inflow (acre-fe
- Page 593 and 594:
Median Seasonal Net Inflow (acre-fe
- Page 595 and 596:
Median Seasonal Net Inflow (acre-fe
- Page 597 and 598:
16.5 Appendix E: Observed and Model
- Page 599 and 600:
Observed and modeled proposed actio
- Page 601 and 602:
Observed and modeled proposed actio
- Page 603 and 604:
16.6 Appendix F: Analyzing the rela
- Page 605 and 606:
Table 1. Paired comparison of the c
- Page 607:
Table 3. The difference in the mean