09.04.2014 Views

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 australian maritime issues 2009: spc-a annual<br />

been steadily decreasing. Thus, while MFAS are clearly a continuing and important<br />

technology for these navies, their contribution to the total sound budget of the oceans<br />

is likely to have declined over the last 70 years. To fully understand the implications<br />

of the fleet size and technologies involved as they evolve over time will require more<br />

explicit analyses than this basic history provides. However, it does give a perspective<br />

for how sonar and its sound parameters have evolved during a time period in which<br />

we have also become increasingly aware of marine mammal populations, strandings,<br />

and a potential role of human sound impacts in those events.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors would like to thank F Martin and E Harland for their assistance in<br />

documenting the history of active sonar. The authors appreciate the assistance of<br />

P Tyack, DR Ketten, and R Gisiner for their input, and they appreciate the helpful<br />

comments of the reviewers. The authors acknowledge the Office of Naval Research and<br />

OPNAV Environmental Readiness Division (CNO N45) for funding portions of this work.<br />

This paper was originally published in Aquatic Mammals, vol. 35, no. 4, 2009, pp. 426-34.<br />

We thank the authors for their permission to republish this work. <strong>Australian</strong> readers should<br />

note that the <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Navy</strong>’s active sonars have been developed in parallel with<br />

those of the US <strong>Navy</strong>. All naval professionals should be cognisant of the impact that the<br />

use of sonars may have on marine mammals, but should also be aware of the associated<br />

scientific facts, such as those presented in this paper.<br />

Notes<br />

1<br />

A Frantzis, ‘Does Acoustic Testing Strand Whales?’ Nature, vol. 392, 1998, p. 29; A Frantzis,<br />

‘The First Mass Stranding that was Associated with the use of Active Sonar (Kyparissiakos Gulf,<br />

Greece, 1996)’, European Cetacean Society Newsletter, vol. 42 (special issue), 2004, pp. 14-20; DL<br />

Evans & GR England, Joint Interim Report, Bahamas Marine Mammal Stranding Event of 15-16 March<br />

2000, US Department of Commerce and Secretary of the <strong>Navy</strong>, Washington DC, 2001; V Martín<br />

Martel, Especial Varamiento de Cetáceos: Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente (Stranding of ceta-ceans:<br />

Special-Deputy Ministry for the Environment), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Government of the<br />

Canary Island, (18 November 2009); J Brownell,<br />

L Robert, T Yamada, JG Mead, & AL van Helden, Mass Strandings of Cuvier’s Beaked Whales in<br />

Japan: US Naval Acoustic Link? (Paper SC/56/E37), Presented at the International Whaling<br />

Commission Scientific Commission’s 56th Annual Meeting, Sorrento, Italy, July 2004; L Freitas,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!