09.04.2014 Views

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174 australian maritime issues 2009: spc-a annual<br />

cause the reliance on commercial contract to fail. Due to the global financial crisis, there<br />

are over 450 container and hybrid Ro/Ro containerships sitting idle worldwide. 36 There<br />

are 1550 new ships on order for construction over the next few years. In some cases<br />

shipping companies have paid a large deposit and had to walk away from partially built<br />

ships. 37 Although not specifically designed to support amphibious lift, for the cost of 20<br />

to 30 crew and under A$50 million, Australia could procure dedicated, new or relatively<br />

new commercially designed strategic lift ships. With minor modifications, these ships<br />

could greatly enhance the supportability of the sea basing concept.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This essay explained the US concept of sea basing, looked at the littoral environment<br />

that makes up Australia’s POE and reviewed <strong>Australian</strong> land, maritime and amphibious<br />

doctrine to determine if sea basing is a power projection platform or just a pipe dream<br />

for Australia. It is clear that the US <strong>Navy</strong> and US Marine Corps concept of sea basing<br />

is unachievable for the ADF as its size, scope, and global reach are neither affordable<br />

nor required. However, this does not mean that the concepts and benefits of sea<br />

basing should be ignored, it just needs to be appropriately scaled to fit the ADF’s<br />

requirements. Sea basing is not a power projection platform but it is actually a power<br />

projection concept as it supports existing doctrine and capability. In the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

context, sea basing simply improves current effectiveness. Furthermore, Australia<br />

should develop a sea basing capability as it supports existing land and maritime<br />

doctrine while improving deployment timelines, force protection capability, force<br />

supportability and manoeuvrability. The only outstanding area of concern is the<br />

supportability of the sea basing concept when faced with an enduring operation. This<br />

will be addressed somewhat by the procurement of an amphibious strategic sealift<br />

capability. However, a lack of traditional sealift capabilities could cause the sea base<br />

concept to be unsustainable beyond a few weeks. Although there are other minor areas<br />

that should be addressed, as the sea basing concept is further developed, the joint and<br />

doctrinal obstacles will be overcome.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!