09.04.2014 Views

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 australian maritime issues 2009: spc-a annual<br />

Modern amphibious or littoral manoeuvre doctrine espouses seamless multidimensional<br />

manoeuvre by projecting force from the sea directly to the objective without stopping at<br />

the beachhead. Furthermore, modern littoral manoeuvre concepts aim to increase force<br />

flexibility and mobility by limiting the force footprint ashore and basing components<br />

at sea to enable the force ‘to move freely between objectives, poise as required and<br />

engage and disengage at will’. 23 MOLE has failed to fully realise or exploit these<br />

modern manoeuvrist characteristics of amphibious warfare. 24 Moreover, MOLE lays the<br />

continental manoeuvrist foundations to which the globally accepted littoral manoeuvre<br />

concepts of Ship to Objective Manoeuvre (STOM), Distributed Operations (DO) and<br />

sea basing could be a major force multiplier and/or critical enabler.<br />

Ship To Objective Manoeuvre<br />

MOLE’s entry methodology seeks to insert forces close to or onto objectives in order<br />

to achieve decisive outcomes, exact surprise upon the adversary and avoid the pause<br />

associated with securing and establishing a point of disembarkation. 25 This is not<br />

conceptually new as it is a key feature of the existing littoral or amphibious warfare<br />

concept known as STOM:<br />

STOM emphasises focus on the projection of force by both surface and air<br />

means directly to the objective from the sea, to dislocate the adversary in<br />

time and space. STOM balances high impact with a smaller footprint and<br />

offers freedom of manoeuvre to achieve surprise and maintain tempo. 26<br />

If fully exploited joint or multidimensional manoeuvre and the concept of STOM could<br />

offer the MOLE concept a more seamless transition between the entry and manoeuvre<br />

phases of the operation. Within the entry phase MOLE articulates a requirement for a subphase<br />

called exploitation to set preconditions for the manoeuvre phase, however modern<br />

joint manoeuvre can negate the requirement for a pause for exploitation. 27 The concept of<br />

exploitation appears to reflect the establishment of a beachhead concept or ‘the break in<br />

then pour it all ashore approach that characterised many historical amphibious operations’. 28<br />

This is evidenced by MOLE’s specific reference to the establishment of ‘an FOB [Forward<br />

Operating Base] or force maintenance area for combat support and combat service support<br />

(CSS) elements’ in the exploitation sub-phase. 29 With the acquisition of the Amphibious<br />

Deployment and Sustainment (ADAS) System the ADF will have the capacity to execute<br />

STOM inserting ‘two company groups by air in two waves and concurrent insertion of two<br />

company groups by surface means in multiple waves’ thus allowing rapid generation of<br />

combat power ashore (potentially to multiple objectives) to facilitate seamless transition<br />

between the entry phase and manoeuvre phase with limited requirement for a pause for<br />

exploitation. 30 Furthermore, the concept of STOM is conducive to the deployment of small<br />

combined arms teams to which the Army’s Joint Land Combat and MOLE concept refer. 31<br />

These small combined arms teams are suited to fighting in a complex littoral environment<br />

and insertion into a number of dispersed entry locations. 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!