08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

intersection characteristics and manoeuvres, intersections were also grouped<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r according to <strong>the</strong> combination of characteristics that pertained to<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, and <strong>the</strong> manoeuvre <strong>the</strong> <strong>driver</strong> had to carry out. For grouping<br />

purposes, intersections and <strong>the</strong> necessary manoeuvres were first scored on<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r participants had to: 1) pay attention to o<strong>the</strong>r traffic participants<br />

before passing <strong>the</strong> intersection (yes/no), 2) think about what is left and right<br />

(yes/no), 3) turn <strong>the</strong> steering wheel (yes/no), and 4) turn in front of a traffic<br />

stream (0‐3 streams). Total scores ranged from zero to six. Intersections were<br />

<strong>the</strong>n grouped according to <strong>the</strong>ir total score. In order of difficulty (from very<br />

easy to very difficult), <strong>the</strong> resulting categories were (nint = number of<br />

intersections):<br />

• (IM1) Right of way (nint = 5)<br />

• (IM2) Yield to approaching traffic on a 3‐way intersection while turning left ( ┤) (nint = 4)<br />

• (IM3) Yield to approaching traffic on a 4‐way intersection while turning left (nint = 5)<br />

• (IM4) Enter a roundabout (nint = 2)<br />

• (IM5) Yield to traffic from <strong>the</strong> right while crossing an intersection (nint = 3)<br />

• (IM6) Cross a major road or turn right onto it (nint = 3)<br />

• (IM7) Turn left at a 3‐way intersection (┬) (nint = 3)<br />

• (IM8) Turn left at a 4‐way intersection (nint = 3)<br />

Again, mixed between‐within analysis of variance showed that functional<br />

age significantly affected reaction time (F(2, 36) = 6.349; p = 0.004; η 2 = 0.261)<br />

and fraction missed (F(2, 36)=5.630; p = 0.007; η 2 = 0.238). Post hoc Bonferroni<br />

tests showed that functionally <strong>older</strong> participants had longer reaction times<br />

than functionally younger and functionally middle‐aged participants (p =<br />

0.004 and p = 0.037 respectively), and that <strong>the</strong>ir fractions missed were higher<br />

than those of functionally younger participants (p = 0.006).<br />

The combined intersection and manoeuvre characteristics (IM) also<br />

significantly affected reaction time and fraction missed (see Table 6.6).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong> variance in <strong>the</strong> dependent variables reaction<br />

time and fraction missed that can be attributed to this newly created variable<br />

(η 2 = 0.264 and η 2 = 0.228 respectively) is lower than it was for <strong>the</strong> previously<br />

described variable of intersection layout (η 2 = 0.355 and η 2 = 0.321<br />

respectively). Moreover, results of <strong>the</strong> post hoc Bonferroni tests for <strong>the</strong> latter<br />

variable were more consistent with <strong>the</strong> expected difficulty of various<br />

intersection layouts (see third column of Table 6.5) than results of <strong>the</strong> post hoc<br />

Bonferroni tests for <strong>the</strong> combined intersection and manoeuvre characteristics<br />

were with <strong>the</strong>ir expected order. As a result, reaction times and fractions<br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!