08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

participant drove off with <strong>the</strong> intention to pass <strong>the</strong> intersection (Acc_Pre).<br />

The relevant vehicles (i.e., those having right of way) decelerated less during<br />

<strong>the</strong> drives during which participants were supported, than during <strong>the</strong> drives<br />

without <strong>driver</strong> support (see Table 8.9 for means and standard errors; F(1, 37)<br />

= 5.493, p = 0.025, η 2 = 0.129). The same effect was found for <strong>the</strong> messages<br />

RoW that told participants that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselves were driving on a major road<br />

(F(1, 37) = 4.299, p = 0.045, η 2 = 0.104). However, this effect only related to<br />

those intersections at which participants, while driving on a major road,<br />

turned left into a minor road. The o<strong>the</strong>r intersections at major roads were not<br />

included in this particular analysis. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is not quite clear why <strong>the</strong><br />

RoW‐messages would affect <strong>the</strong> safety of a decision to turn in front of an<br />

approaching vehicle.<br />

Messages regarding right of way for traffic approaching from <strong>the</strong> right (YtR)<br />

affected <strong>the</strong> frequency of unsafe decisions (Acc_Crit). Unsafe decisions<br />

occurred less frequently while being supported than while not being<br />

supported (F(1, 37) = 9.437, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.203).<br />

Functional age did not affect <strong>the</strong> safety of decisions, nei<strong>the</strong>r as a main effect<br />

nor as part of an interaction effect. For those messages that significantly<br />

improved <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions, all functional age groups showed <strong>the</strong><br />

same trend.<br />

Acc_Pre<br />

(lower value = less safe decisions)<br />

Acc_Crit<br />

(higher value = fewer safe decisions)<br />

Mean Standard error Mean Standard error<br />

RoW<br />

No support<br />

Support<br />

‐ 0.113<br />

0.057*<br />

0.056<br />

0.042<br />

0.224<br />

0.183<br />

0.030<br />

0.026<br />

YtR<br />

No support<br />

Support<br />

‐ 0.457<br />

‐ 0.331<br />

0.066<br />

0.081<br />

0.331<br />

0.227**<br />

0.028<br />

0.022<br />

AMR<br />

No support<br />

Support<br />

0.005<br />

0.130*<br />

0.042<br />

0.033<br />

0.108<br />

0.100<br />

0.018<br />

0.018<br />

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01<br />

Table 8.9. Means for safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions per priority regulation, without and with<br />

<strong>driver</strong> support.<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!