Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />
functional age were not established for workload. However, functional age<br />
did affect workload in general. In most cases, functionally old participants<br />
had higher workloads than functionally young participants (see e.g., Ponds,<br />
Brouwer & Van Wolffelaar, 1988, and McDowd & Craik, 1988 for similar<br />
results). This seems to be <strong>the</strong> mere result of having to carry out two tasks<br />
simultaneously. The reaction times of <strong>driver</strong>s of different functional age<br />
groups were <strong>the</strong> same when <strong>the</strong>y had to carry out a detection task while <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were sitting in a parked simulator car. However, when performing <strong>the</strong> same<br />
task while driving, functionally old <strong>driver</strong>s had longer reaction times than<br />
both functionally young and middle‐aged <strong>driver</strong>s. A related study showed<br />
that as traffic situations got more difficult, <strong>the</strong> workload of all <strong>driver</strong>s<br />
increased fur<strong>the</strong>r. However, this increase in workload did not increase with<br />
functional age. An interaction effect was only established for <strong>the</strong> increased<br />
effort needed to combine <strong>the</strong> primary and secondary task (Davidse, Van<br />
Wolffelaar, Hagenzieker & Brouwer, 2007; see Chapter 6).<br />
Driver support also affected general driving behaviour. Messages regarding<br />
an obstructed view of <strong>the</strong> intersection and messages which reminded<br />
participants that <strong>the</strong>y had to yield to traffic from <strong>the</strong> right led to lower<br />
driving speeds on <strong>the</strong> corresponding intersections. Messages regarding safe<br />
gaps that were sent to participants who, while driving on a major road,<br />
turned left in front of oncoming vehicles, led to higher speeds while passing<br />
<strong>the</strong> intersections.<br />
For some messages, <strong>the</strong> actual delivery of <strong>the</strong> message was dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />
behaviour of <strong>the</strong> participant. Messages regarding <strong>the</strong> approach of a major<br />
road or an obstructed view of <strong>the</strong> intersection, for example, were only sent if<br />
<strong>the</strong> participant drove at a speed that was higher than 30 km/h, assuming <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>driver</strong> had already adjusted behaviour to <strong>the</strong> local circumstances if he was<br />
driving slower. As a result, <strong>the</strong> average number of messages received by<br />
participants could vary. Surprisingly, functionally old participants received<br />
<strong>the</strong> fewest messages regarding safe gaps, <strong>the</strong> approach of a major road, and<br />
changed speed limits. A possible explanation for <strong>the</strong> first type of messages<br />
may be that <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s stopped fur<strong>the</strong>r away from <strong>the</strong> intersection to look<br />
for safe gaps in <strong>the</strong> traffic stream. A related study that examined o<strong>the</strong>r data<br />
of this same experiment showed that functionally old participants generally<br />
stopped two meters fur<strong>the</strong>r away from <strong>the</strong> intersection to decide whe<strong>the</strong>r it<br />
was safe to join traffic after turning left or right than both young and middleaged<br />
participants did (13.8 m versus 11.7 m and 11.8 m respectively; see<br />
Davidse, Van Wolffelaar, Hagenzieker & Brouwer, 2007 or Chapter 6). As<br />
186