08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

However, intersections were expected to be exchangeable as long as <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were identical according to <strong>the</strong> intersection characteristic being studied.<br />

Between‐subjects analysis of variance showed that functional age did not<br />

affect <strong>the</strong> average deceleration of relevant vehicles (i.e., those having right of<br />

way) at <strong>the</strong> moment participants started passing an intersection (Acc_Pre).<br />

The proportion of unsafe decisions per intersection type (Acc_Crit) was not<br />

affected by functional age ei<strong>the</strong>r (see Table 6.6). Separate mixed betweenwithin<br />

analyses of variance for <strong>the</strong> various intersection characteristics led to<br />

<strong>the</strong> same conclusion: age did not affect <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> various intersection characteristics did influence <strong>the</strong> degree of<br />

deceleration and <strong>the</strong> proportion of unsafe decisions (see Table 6.6). The only<br />

exception was sight distance. This intersection characteristic did not affect <strong>the</strong><br />

average deceleration of relevant vehicles at <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>the</strong> participant drove<br />

off with <strong>the</strong> intention to pass <strong>the</strong> intersection, although it did affect <strong>the</strong><br />

proportion of unsafe decisions (η 2 = 0.260). All o<strong>the</strong>r intersection<br />

characteristics had partial eta’s squared ranging from 0.329 to 0.452 for<br />

deceleration values and ranging from 0.538 to 0.623 for proportion of unsafe<br />

decisions. The combination of intersection characteristics and necessary<br />

manoeuvres (IM) had <strong>the</strong> largest influence on variation in both proportion of<br />

unsafe decisions and deceleration of relevant vehicles. Post hoc Bonferroni<br />

tests showed that almost all types of intersections had significantly different<br />

proportions of unsafe decisions. Only IM2, IM6 and IM8 had similar<br />

proportions of unsafe decisions, and IM3 and IM5. The trends were,<br />

however, different from <strong>the</strong> ones expected beforehand. Three intersection<br />

types that were expected to be of medium difficulty (IM3 to IM5) turned out<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> ones that most often led to unsafe decisions. The intersections that<br />

were expected to be <strong>the</strong> most difficult (IM6 to IM8) only seldom led to unsafe<br />

decisions (see Figure 6.5).<br />

This lack of correspondence between expected difficulty and safety of <strong>driver</strong><br />

decisions could have been <strong>the</strong> result of an intersection classification that does<br />

not reflect <strong>the</strong> actual difficulty of passing <strong>the</strong> respective types of<br />

intersections. After all, analyses of workload data already showed that <strong>the</strong><br />

results of post hoc Bonferroni tests for <strong>the</strong> combined intersection and<br />

manoeuvre characteristics did not correspond with <strong>the</strong> expected order of<br />

easy and difficult intersections (see Section 6.3.2). However, when comparing<br />

<strong>the</strong> proportions of unsafe decisions for intersections classified according to<br />

an intersection characteristic that turned out to be a better predictor of task<br />

difficulty (i.e., intersection layout) <strong>the</strong> same pattern emerged (see Figure 6.6).<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!