08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

less decelerations of relevant o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles. The message regarding an<br />

unexpected one‐way street led to fewer route‐errors.<br />

Type of message<br />

Priority regulation<br />

Right of Way<br />

Yield to Right<br />

Approaching Major Road<br />

Workload<br />

(+ = higher workload)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

+<br />

Safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions<br />

(+ = safer decisions)<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

Safe gaps 0 +<br />

Short sight distances 0 +<br />

Deviating situation: one‐way street + Fewer route errors<br />

Table 3. Effects of in‐car assistance systems.<br />

Differential effect of functional age<br />

As <strong>the</strong> assistive devices described above were selected based on <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

weaknesses of <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>, it was expected that <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s would<br />

benefit more from <strong>the</strong>ir support than younger <strong>driver</strong>s would. That is, it was<br />

expected that people with functional limitations will benefit more from <strong>the</strong><br />

support provided by <strong>the</strong> selected assistive devices than people with no<br />

functional limitations. Therefore, functional age ra<strong>the</strong>r than chronological<br />

age was used to compare workload and driving performance between age<br />

groups. Functional age was based on scores on three tests of cognitive<br />

functioning, relating to reaction time, selective attention, and visual‐motor<br />

coordination. Persons scoring well on <strong>the</strong> average of <strong>the</strong>se three tests were<br />

considered to be functionally young, whereas persons scoring relatively poor<br />

on <strong>the</strong>m were considered to be functionally old. People scoring in between<br />

were considered to be functionally middle‐aged. Although it turned out that<br />

<strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> chronologically <strong>older</strong> people was also functionally old,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re were some exceptions. One of <strong>the</strong> chronologically old participants even<br />

appeared to be functionally young. At <strong>the</strong> same time, two of <strong>the</strong><br />

chronologically young participants appeared to be functionally old. This<br />

underlines <strong>the</strong> importance of a personal approach in decisions about fitness<br />

to drive.<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!