Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />
less decelerations of relevant o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles. The message regarding an<br />
unexpected one‐way street led to fewer route‐errors.<br />
Type of message<br />
Priority regulation<br />
Right of Way<br />
Yield to Right<br />
Approaching Major Road<br />
Workload<br />
(+ = higher workload)<br />
0<br />
0<br />
+<br />
Safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions<br />
(+ = safer decisions)<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
Safe gaps 0 +<br />
Short sight distances 0 +<br />
Deviating situation: one‐way street + Fewer route errors<br />
Table 3. Effects of in‐car assistance systems.<br />
Differential effect of functional age<br />
As <strong>the</strong> assistive devices described above were selected based on <strong>the</strong> relative<br />
weaknesses of <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>, it was expected that <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s would<br />
benefit more from <strong>the</strong>ir support than younger <strong>driver</strong>s would. That is, it was<br />
expected that people with functional limitations will benefit more from <strong>the</strong><br />
support provided by <strong>the</strong> selected assistive devices than people with no<br />
functional limitations. Therefore, functional age ra<strong>the</strong>r than chronological<br />
age was used to compare workload and driving performance between age<br />
groups. Functional age was based on scores on three tests of cognitive<br />
functioning, relating to reaction time, selective attention, and visual‐motor<br />
coordination. Persons scoring well on <strong>the</strong> average of <strong>the</strong>se three tests were<br />
considered to be functionally young, whereas persons scoring relatively poor<br />
on <strong>the</strong>m were considered to be functionally old. People scoring in between<br />
were considered to be functionally middle‐aged. Although it turned out that<br />
<strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> chronologically <strong>older</strong> people was also functionally old,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re were some exceptions. One of <strong>the</strong> chronologically old participants even<br />
appeared to be functionally young. At <strong>the</strong> same time, two of <strong>the</strong><br />
chronologically young participants appeared to be functionally old. This<br />
underlines <strong>the</strong> importance of a personal approach in decisions about fitness<br />
to drive.<br />
198