08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

to respond as soon as <strong>the</strong>y detected <strong>the</strong> red square by pressing a microswitch<br />

that was attached to <strong>the</strong> index finger of <strong>the</strong>ir left hand. Reaction time was<br />

measured in milliseconds. If a reaction time had not been detected within 2.5<br />

s from <strong>the</strong> onset of <strong>the</strong> stimulus, this was coded as a missed signal. Series of<br />

signals were presented during <strong>the</strong> approach and passing of a selected<br />

number of intersections and while driving on three straight road sections.<br />

The 28 selected intersections were representative for <strong>the</strong> total group of 71<br />

intersections, at <strong>the</strong> same time preventing participants having to perform <strong>the</strong><br />

detection task at every intersection <strong>the</strong>y passed. The onset of a series of<br />

signals was announced with a bell tone. During <strong>the</strong> series of signals (one<br />

series per intersection), on average every 3.5 s, with random variation<br />

between 3 and 4 s, a stimulus was presented at a horizontal angle of 10 to 20<br />

degrees to <strong>the</strong> left of <strong>the</strong> line between <strong>the</strong> eyes of <strong>the</strong> participant and <strong>the</strong><br />

centre of <strong>the</strong> screen. Stimuli were presented at a vertical angle of 3 degrees<br />

above <strong>the</strong> horizon. Average reaction time and fraction of missed signals per<br />

intersection (number of missed signals divided by total number of sent<br />

signals while passing <strong>the</strong> relevant intersection) were used as workload<br />

indices for <strong>the</strong> intersections. Higher reaction times and higher fractions of<br />

missed signals were interpreted as being <strong>the</strong> result of a higher workload.<br />

Baseline reaction times and fractions missed were collected at <strong>the</strong> start of <strong>the</strong><br />

first experimental drive. While <strong>the</strong> simulator car was parked at <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

of <strong>the</strong> route, and <strong>the</strong> participant was sitting in <strong>the</strong> <strong>driver</strong> seat, one series of<br />

twenty stimuli was presented. On average every 4 s, with random variation<br />

between 3 and 5 s, a stimulus was presented at a horizontal angle of 10 to 20<br />

degrees to <strong>the</strong> left of <strong>the</strong> line between <strong>the</strong> eyes of <strong>the</strong> participant and <strong>the</strong><br />

centre of <strong>the</strong> screen. Again, participants were instructed to press <strong>the</strong> button<br />

as soon as <strong>the</strong>y saw <strong>the</strong> stimulus. A second baseline was provided by <strong>the</strong><br />

straight road sections at which <strong>the</strong> same series of stimuli were shown as<br />

during <strong>the</strong> approach and passing of <strong>the</strong> selected number of intersections.<br />

This second baseline differed from <strong>the</strong> first one in three ways: 1) participants<br />

were driving, 2) it always took place during <strong>the</strong> same drive as in which <strong>the</strong><br />

relevant intersection data were ga<strong>the</strong>red (same support condition), and 3) <strong>the</strong><br />

frequency at which <strong>the</strong> stimuli were presented was every 3.5 s instead of<br />

every 4 s. Practise on <strong>the</strong> PDT was provided during <strong>the</strong> familiarization run.<br />

Before any of <strong>the</strong> analyses with regard to workload (see Section 8.2.5) were<br />

carried out, all average reaction times – those averaged per intersection as<br />

well as those averaged per baseline – were first corrected for missing data.<br />

Initially, average reaction times represented <strong>the</strong> average of <strong>the</strong> reaction times<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!