08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects of a <strong>driver</strong> support system on workload and driving performance<br />

found messages came too soon, 60% of <strong>the</strong> functionally old participants<br />

considered <strong>the</strong>m to come too late.<br />

If asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y would buy <strong>the</strong> system if it were on <strong>the</strong> market, 35% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> participants gave an affirmative answer. Half of <strong>the</strong>m was willing to pay<br />

for it. If <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> system installed in <strong>the</strong>ir car, 30% indicated that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

would be more inclined to drive in an unfamiliar city.<br />

8.5. Discussion and conclusions<br />

In this study, a <strong>driver</strong> support system was evaluated in terms of effects on<br />

workload, general driving behaviour and safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions, as well<br />

as in terms of user acceptance. The <strong>driver</strong> support system was simulated<br />

while participants drove in a fixed base driving simulator, and provided <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>driver</strong> with information regarding priority regulation, safe gaps to join or<br />

cross traffic streams, obstructed views of intersections, one‐way streets and<br />

changed speed limits. The effects of <strong>the</strong> support system were compared<br />

between participants that differed in functional age, which was based on<br />

scores on three tests of cognitive functioning, relating to reaction time,<br />

selective attention, and visual‐motor coordination.<br />

8.5.1. Effects on workload and <strong>driver</strong> performance<br />

The results of this study showed that all three safety‐related messages<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions. Messages regarding <strong>the</strong> priority<br />

regulation, obstructed view of an intersection, and safe gaps to join or cross<br />

traffic streams led to fewer and/or less decelerations of relevant o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

vehicles. These decelerations were considered to be precursors of a collision.<br />

Fewer and less decelerations can be regarded as safer decisions. The message<br />

regarding an unexpected one‐way street led to fewer route‐errors. In general,<br />

effects of <strong>the</strong> messages were <strong>the</strong> same for functionally young, middle‐aged<br />

and old <strong>driver</strong>s. The only interaction effect that was established concerned<br />

messages regarding an obstructed view of <strong>the</strong> intersection. Functionally<br />

middle‐aged participants appeared to profit <strong>the</strong> most from <strong>the</strong>se messages as<br />

far as <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions was concerned.<br />

Workload was not reduced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>driver</strong> support system. To <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />

messages regarding <strong>the</strong> approach of a major road and messages regarding an<br />

unexpected one‐way street even led to an increased workload as indicated by<br />

reaction times on a secondary task. Interaction effects of <strong>driver</strong> support and<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!