Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Effects of a <strong>driver</strong> support system on workload and driving performance<br />
found messages came too soon, 60% of <strong>the</strong> functionally old participants<br />
considered <strong>the</strong>m to come too late.<br />
If asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y would buy <strong>the</strong> system if it were on <strong>the</strong> market, 35% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> participants gave an affirmative answer. Half of <strong>the</strong>m was willing to pay<br />
for it. If <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> system installed in <strong>the</strong>ir car, 30% indicated that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
would be more inclined to drive in an unfamiliar city.<br />
8.5. Discussion and conclusions<br />
In this study, a <strong>driver</strong> support system was evaluated in terms of effects on<br />
workload, general driving behaviour and safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions, as well<br />
as in terms of user acceptance. The <strong>driver</strong> support system was simulated<br />
while participants drove in a fixed base driving simulator, and provided <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>driver</strong> with information regarding priority regulation, safe gaps to join or<br />
cross traffic streams, obstructed views of intersections, one‐way streets and<br />
changed speed limits. The effects of <strong>the</strong> support system were compared<br />
between participants that differed in functional age, which was based on<br />
scores on three tests of cognitive functioning, relating to reaction time,<br />
selective attention, and visual‐motor coordination.<br />
8.5.1. Effects on workload and <strong>driver</strong> performance<br />
The results of this study showed that all three safety‐related messages<br />
increased <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions. Messages regarding <strong>the</strong> priority<br />
regulation, obstructed view of an intersection, and safe gaps to join or cross<br />
traffic streams led to fewer and/or less decelerations of relevant o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
vehicles. These decelerations were considered to be precursors of a collision.<br />
Fewer and less decelerations can be regarded as safer decisions. The message<br />
regarding an unexpected one‐way street led to fewer route‐errors. In general,<br />
effects of <strong>the</strong> messages were <strong>the</strong> same for functionally young, middle‐aged<br />
and old <strong>driver</strong>s. The only interaction effect that was established concerned<br />
messages regarding an obstructed view of <strong>the</strong> intersection. Functionally<br />
middle‐aged participants appeared to profit <strong>the</strong> most from <strong>the</strong>se messages as<br />
far as <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>driver</strong> decisions was concerned.<br />
Workload was not reduced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>driver</strong> support system. To <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />
messages regarding <strong>the</strong> approach of a major road and messages regarding an<br />
unexpected one‐way street even led to an increased workload as indicated by<br />
reaction times on a secondary task. Interaction effects of <strong>driver</strong> support and<br />
185