08.09.2014 Views

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

Assisting the older driver - SWOV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Intersection design and <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />

Stop- and yield-controlled intersections<br />

At stop‐ and yield‐controlled intersections having opposite left‐turn lanes<br />

(and at intersections where protected‐only operations are not possible, e.g.,<br />

because of an unacceptable reduction in capacity), Staplin et al. (2001)<br />

suggest that safety could be improved by adjusting <strong>the</strong> left‐turn lane<br />

geometry. Opposite left‐turn lanes and <strong>the</strong> traffic that uses <strong>the</strong>se lanes can<br />

restrict <strong>the</strong> left‐turning <strong>driver</strong>’s view of oncoming traffic in through lanes.<br />

The level of blockage depends on how <strong>the</strong> opposite left‐turn lanes are<br />

aligned with respect to each o<strong>the</strong>r, as well as <strong>the</strong> type and size of <strong>the</strong> vehicles<br />

in <strong>the</strong> opposing queue. Restricted sight distance can be minimized or<br />

eliminated by shifting opposite left‐turn lanes to <strong>the</strong> right (positive offset) so<br />

that left‐turning <strong>driver</strong>s do not block each o<strong>the</strong>r’s view of oncoming traffic<br />

(Staplin, Harkey, Lococo & Tarawneh, 1997). Figure 5.1 shows <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between opposite left‐turn lanes that are exactly aligned (i.e., no offset) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> situation where <strong>the</strong> opposite left‐turn lane is shifted to <strong>the</strong> right (i.e.,<br />

positive offset).<br />

Figure 5.1. No offset versus positive offset (Staplin et al., 2001).<br />

It is not so much <strong>the</strong> degree of positive offset that matters, as does <strong>the</strong> sight<br />

distance that results from a certain positive offset. Left‐turn lanes frequently<br />

used by heavy lorries need a larger offset, since <strong>the</strong>se lorries have a more<br />

adverse effect on sight distance. McCoy, Navarro and Witt (1992) have<br />

developed an approach that can be used to compute <strong>the</strong> amount of offset that<br />

is required to minimize or eliminate <strong>the</strong> sight restriction caused by opposing<br />

left‐turn vehicles. Where <strong>the</strong> provision of unrestricted sight distance is not<br />

feasible, Staplin et al. (2001) recommend to compute stopping sight distance<br />

using a perception‐reaction time of 2.5 second to allow for <strong>the</strong> slower<br />

information processing of <strong>older</strong> adults.<br />

A possible negative side effect of a positive offset of canalized left‐turn lanes<br />

(e.g., a parallel or tapered left‐turn lane between two medians) is <strong>the</strong><br />

potential for wrong‐way manoeuvres by <strong>driver</strong>s turning left from an<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!