Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Intersection design and <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />
deviations from <strong>the</strong> common intersection layout (experience and schemata).<br />
However, <strong>the</strong>re was not enough information available to define <strong>the</strong>se<br />
hypo<strong>the</strong>ses in more detail. For example, expecting that larger deviations<br />
from <strong>the</strong> common intersection design lead to higher task demands is one<br />
thing, but defining what <strong>the</strong> common intersection design is, is ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
Therefore, it was decided to change <strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong> study from an<br />
experimental study aimed at testing <strong>the</strong> abovementioned hypo<strong>the</strong>ses to an<br />
exploratory study aimed at ga<strong>the</strong>ring information about intersections at<br />
which relatively many crashes occur in which <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s are involved, and<br />
comparing <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong>se intersections with those of<br />
intersections at which relatively few crashes occur in which <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s are<br />
involved.<br />
While carrying out this exploratory study, apart from <strong>the</strong> task demands of<br />
passing a particular intersection and <strong>the</strong> capabilities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>driver</strong>, a third<br />
factor was taken into account that may influence <strong>the</strong> involvement of <strong>older</strong><br />
<strong>driver</strong>s in crashes at a particular intersection: <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>’s exposure.<br />
Older <strong>driver</strong>s may pass certain intersections more often than o<strong>the</strong>rs. This<br />
may be <strong>the</strong> result of facilities <strong>the</strong>y do and do not use (e.g., library, hospital,<br />
school), but it may also be <strong>the</strong> result of consciously avoiding certain<br />
intersections. The latter may be connected with <strong>the</strong> perceived difficulty of<br />
passing <strong>the</strong>m. One way or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, exposure should also be taken into<br />
account when comparing intersections with different shares of crashes<br />
involving <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong>s.<br />
5.2.2. Method<br />
Selection of intersections<br />
Thirty intersections were selected using <strong>the</strong> road accident database of <strong>the</strong><br />
Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management: 15<br />
intersections at which relatively many crashes involving <strong>older</strong> adult <strong>driver</strong>s<br />
occurred (Group Intold; at least 30% of all crashes at that intersection) and 15<br />
intersections at which no crashes involving <strong>older</strong> adults occurred (Group<br />
Intyoung). For practical reasons, all intersections were located in <strong>the</strong> Dutch<br />
province of South Holland.<br />
The intersections were selected based on <strong>the</strong> number of injury crashes that<br />
occurred on <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> period between 1990 and 2000, <strong>the</strong> latter year being<br />
<strong>the</strong> most recent year for which crash data were available at <strong>the</strong> time of<br />
selection (2001). To make sure that <strong>the</strong> assignment of an intersection to one of<br />
<strong>the</strong> two groups was based on solid data, at least 10 crashes had to have taken<br />
79