Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Assisting the older driver - SWOV
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Assisting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>driver</strong><br />
Before (n=105) After (n=40) Difference (n=40) a<br />
Usefulness Satisfying Usefulness Satisfying Usefulness Satisfying<br />
Right of way 0.37 ‐0.28 0.57 0.08 0.23 0.48<br />
young 0.41 ‐0.33 0.64 0.15 0.18 0.53<br />
middle 0.30 ‐0.44 0.53 0.04 0.28 0.68<br />
Old 0.46 0.06 0.58 0.08 0.16 0.05<br />
Safe gap 0.20 ‐0.22 0.05 ‐0.29 ‐0.18 0.00<br />
Young ‐0.17 ‐0.61 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.55<br />
Middle 0.27 ‐0.22 ‐0.07 ‐0.48 ‐0.41 ‐0.25<br />
Old 0.52 0.27 0.30 ‐0.23 0.02 ‐0.05<br />
View of <strong>the</strong> intersection 0.52 ‐0.10 0.49 ‐0.10 0.08 0.15<br />
Young 0.27 ‐0.29 0.32 ‐0.38 0.08 ‐0.03<br />
Middle 0.47 ‐0.33 0.57 ‐0.09 0.24 0.41<br />
Old 0.93 0.56 0.50 0.15 ‐0.26 ‐0.20<br />
Deviating rules or situations 0.43 ‐0.13 0.61 0.28 0.18 0.38<br />
Young 0.22 ‐0.44 0.64 0.33 0.18 0.30<br />
Middle 0.26 ‐0.34 0.70 0.30 0.60 0.75<br />
Old 1.05 0.66 0.40 0.20 ‐0.68 ‐0.28<br />
a Difference scores (after ‐ before) were calculated using data of only those participants that completed all parts of<br />
<strong>the</strong> experiment. Their before‐scores on <strong>the</strong> usefulness and satisfying subscales were more negative than those for<br />
all participants toge<strong>the</strong>r. Tests of differences between before‐scores of participants that only filled in <strong>the</strong> first<br />
questionnaire (n=65) and those who filled in both (n=40) were, however, not significant.<br />
Table 8.15. Usefulness and satisfying scores for each type of message.<br />
Differences in user acceptance between age groups were analysed separately<br />
for opinions beforehand and afterwards (between‐subjects). To examine<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r experience with <strong>the</strong> messages affected user acceptance, withinsubjects<br />
analyses of variance and mixed between‐within analyses of variance<br />
were carried out. In addition, <strong>the</strong> support system was evaluated in terms of<br />
audibility, comprehensibility, timing, trustworthiness, and <strong>the</strong> willingness of<br />
people to buy it, based on <strong>the</strong> answers to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r questions that were<br />
presented to <strong>the</strong> participants (see Section 8.2.8).<br />
8.4.1. Age differences<br />
Between‐subjects analyses of variance showed that functional age<br />
significantly affected <strong>the</strong> initial opinions about <strong>the</strong> support system (see Table<br />
8.16). Before having experienced <strong>the</strong> support system, functionally old<br />
participants were more positive than functionally younger participants about<br />
all types of messages, except for messages regarding priority regulation. Post<br />
180