SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Zoran Sapuric, PhD and Vullnet Zenki, MSc. consideration the ecological benefits and the degradation of the environment. Agenda 21 has forty chapters which refer to separate areas of the concept of sustainable development. Agenda 21 calls all the countries to adopt their national strategies for sustainable development which harmonize and integrate all sector policies. As a result, a lot of countries undertake activities about determining their national strategies for sustainable development. As a first country, it was Great Britain to adopt its national strategy, followed by Finland, France, Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg and Denmark. Other EU member states adopted their national strategies for sustainable development after the EU adopted this strategy within the framework of the Union itself, starting with Germany, Sweden, and Austria, and then followed by Spain, Portugal, Greece, and the Netherlands. New EU member states also adopted their national strategies for sustainable development. By doing this, states are actually implementing the dispositions of the concept of sustainable development determined by Agenda 21 and other international documents, whereas EU member states are implementing and refining the dispositions of the strategy of the Union, too. The basic elements of the sustainable development in national strategies are adapted to concrete conditions of each state separately. In this case, there are differences in determining these priorities. In this context, developing countries pay more attention to the economic and social development and, somehow, leave behind issues relating to the protection of the environment and the sustainable exploitation of natural resources. The EU in accordance with the harmonization of its own policies adopted a strategy at Union level. The first EU strategy for sustainable development was adopted at the Summit of the European Council held in June 2001 in Goteborg in Sweden and was called the Goteborg Strategy. This strategy expresses the strong determination for a new approach towards the decision making process within the EU whereupon the obligation that all decisions made in the EU should have into consideration the economic and social aspects as well as aspects relating to the environment is confirmed. According to this strategy, the sustainable development will create economic progress, development of new technologies and new investments, new jobs and better quality of living for all EU citizens. For member states, an obligation for adaptation of their strategies with the strategy of the EU has also been foreseen. The compilation of national strategies has to be in conformity with the EU institutions. The strategy anticipates that all sector policies in the EU will have to take into consideration the sustainable 120
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 development as a crucial component whereupon a better and quicker information exchange among individual EU institutions is required. In this way, the Union clearly shows the determination for a dynamic development of the concept of sustainable development which is confirmed by the decision to further upgrades that strategy. Republic of Macedonia a month ago adopts the national strategy for sustainable development. In this way it creates assumptions for more intensive implementation of the concept. Of course, the implementation of the concept for sustainable development is quite a complex and difficult task compared to its adoption. Concluding recommendations The great disproportion in the development represents a big obstacle for an all-embracing implementation of the concept of sustainable development and at the same time for more efficient protection of the environment at a global level. Even though there is solid progress in the development of the concept of sustainable development, it still is not sufficient and notable. All this requires changes in the concept of global production and consumption in terms of a more rational exploitation of all natural resources. We should bear in mind that developing countries are more vulnerable to numerous global threats. The huge disparities in the development can cause not only worsening of economic, social and ecological differences, but a total obstacles for democratic processes in a many developing countries and the emergence of totalitarian regimes. There are still evidences of different kinds of degradation of the environment and excessive exploitation of all kinds of natural resources, as well as great danger of devastation and lack of food and water in many regions in the world. There is also big poverty, especially having in mind the fact that more than one billion people live in great poverty. When critically reviewing the concept of sustainable development, we should consider the long-term aspect of the concept and expect gradual and continual results, not quick and spectacular ones. There are also negative and contradictory opinions about the concept of sustainable development but they still do not minimize its meaning. The concept of sustainable development has to be open to criticism but also prepared to give arguments to them. In the future, the concept of sustainable development has to be realized as a complex, global and universal concept and has to be positioned as one of 121
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITETI I EVROPËS JUGLINDORE
Page 3:
Contents Foreword by the Editor in
Page 6:
UEJL për këshillat e tij në koh
Page 9 and 10:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 J
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 f
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 c
Page 19 and 20:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 j
Page 21 and 22:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 T
Page 23 and 24:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 a
Page 25 and 26:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 1
Page 27 and 28:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 c
Page 29 and 30:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 t
Page 31 and 32:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 e
Page 33 and 34:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 R
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 n
Page 39 and 40:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 a
Page 41 and 42:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 A
Page 43 and 44:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 w
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 i
Page 49 and 50:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 M
Page 51 and 52:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 G
Page 53 and 54:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009
Page 55 and 56:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 L
Page 57 and 58:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 m
Page 59 and 60:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 L
Page 61 and 62:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 t
Page 63 and 64:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 o
Page 65 and 66:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 g
Page 67 and 68:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 1
Page 69 and 70: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 A
Page 71 and 72: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009
Page 73 and 74: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 a
Page 75 and 76: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 L
Page 77 and 78: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 H
Page 79 and 80: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 T
Page 83 and 84: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 S
Page 87 and 88: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 h
Page 89 and 90: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 1
Page 91 and 92: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 H
Page 93 and 94: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 s
Page 97 and 98: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 m
Page 101 and 102: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 P
Page 103 and 104: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 I
Page 105 and 106: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 e
Page 109 and 110: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 C
Page 113 and 114: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 D
Page 115 and 116: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 g
Page 119: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 a
Page 123 and 124: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 R
Page 125 and 126: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 S
Page 129 and 130: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 W
Page 131 and 132: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 M
Page 133 and 134: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 I
Page 138 and 139: 138 Reviewers: Benjamin Keatinge Dr
Page 140 and 141: Iranda Bajrami, MA kanë qenë të
Page 142 and 143: Iranda Bajrami, MA a state of c
Page 144 and 145: Iranda Bajrami, MA to read and use
Page 146 and 147: Iranda Bajrami, MA Classrooms were
Page 148 and 149: Iranda Bajrami, MA the characterist
Page 150 and 151: Iranda Bajrami, MA Not all the t
Page 152 and 153: Iranda Bajrami, MA reinforce studen
Page 154 and 155: Iranda Bajrami, MA References 1. Am
Page 156 and 157: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix A Facto
Page 158 and 159: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix B Obser
Page 160 and 161: Iranda Bajrami, MA 22. Classroom en
Page 162 and 163: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix C Stude
Page 164 and 165: Iranda Bajrami, MA 9. 10. 11. 12. 1
Page 166 and 167: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix D Teach
Page 168 and 169: Iranda Bajrami, MA 18. 19. 20. 21.
Page 170 and 171:
Iranda Bajrami, MA Consistent with
Page 172 and 173:
172 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Kadri Sule
Page 174 and 175:
Mentor Hamiti, Visar Shehu and Agni
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
194 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Robert Sch
Page 196 and 197:
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gezim Xhaferi and
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
212 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Selim Jusu
Page 214 and 215:
Fatmir Faiku, Haxhere Faiku, Murtez
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
show all

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?