09.11.2014 Views

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Iranda Bajrami, MA<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Not all the teachers accepted the request to be observed.<br />

The observations were conducted at the end of the semester, which<br />

was not the best time for doing it.<br />

The students had difficulties in understanding some of the items in<br />

the questionnaire where technical terms were used.<br />

Moreover, this study revealed eight findings and all of them are explained<br />

separately. The first and the most important finding is that the findings<br />

support the hypothesis of this research. In classes where the teachers used<br />

some or most of the factors for motivating, the students confirmed that they<br />

were motivated. However, in classes where few factors for motivating<br />

students were present the students were not that motivated, or were not at all<br />

motivated. All other findings are related to this one.<br />

The second finding is that there is a correlation between what the<br />

literature says and this study. This study has revealed some useful and<br />

valuable outcomes from the data that was collected. It was proved that in<br />

classes where the teachers used the majority of the factors for motivating<br />

students as cited by scholars (the teacher was positive, showed enthusiasm,<br />

created a stress-free atmosphere, had reasonable expectations, was<br />

knowledgeable of the subject, praised the students, used creative techniques,<br />

applied group work and planned the lesson effectively by creating authentic<br />

and relevant materials) the students were highly motivated.<br />

The third finding is that students, and the observers -- and often the<br />

teachers -- identified most of the same factors for motivation. The<br />

researcher, together with the co-observer, confirmed the validity of student<br />

responses by being present in those classes and in many cases agreed with<br />

the students’ perceptions more than with the teachers’ perceptions that in<br />

some cases tried to show themselves in a better light and were more<br />

subjective.<br />

The fourth finding is that not all motivational factors identified in the<br />

literature were valued equally by the participants in this study. The most<br />

important factors that were valued mostly by the students were the attitudes<br />

and the behaviour of the teacher. Next, classroom management seemed<br />

important. Finally, the materials used were valued by the students.<br />

Finding five is that motivation depends on the number of factors used and<br />

the value placed on them. Classes where it was identified that the teacher<br />

used most of the factors for motivating students, the students were highly<br />

motivated. Then in classes where the teachers used some of them, the<br />

students were somewhat motivated. Finally, in classes where only few<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!