09.11.2014 Views

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SEEU</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Volume 5, No. 2, 2009<br />

consistency between what most of the students in one class confirmed to be<br />

motivating and what factors they considered to be mostly positive.<br />

Present Study III: Teacher Questionnaire<br />

A similar questionnaire to the student questionnaire was given to the six<br />

teachers that were observed. Since six classrooms were observed, six<br />

teachers received a questionnaire. The teachers filled in their questionnaires<br />

(See Appendix D, for Teacher Questionnaire) while the students completed<br />

theirs. The purpose of the teacher questionnaire was to see the comparison<br />

between the teachers in evaluating their own teaching and the students’<br />

answers. Although the teachers might be subjective at some points and have<br />

a higher opinion of their teaching, the student questionnaires and certainly<br />

the observation checklist together helped to create a clearer picture of the<br />

actual teaching and to get reliable and valid results.<br />

Findings<br />

In order to obtain results in a more effective way, the rubric was created<br />

and some categories were designed. The rubric created was supposed to<br />

collect and compare the findings from all three sources -- the student<br />

questionnaires, the teacher questionnaires and the observation checklist. The<br />

rubric was divided into four parts and it included the information about:<br />

Learner, Teacher, Materials + Tasks and Classroom Management. For a<br />

better clarification and identification each class was given a letter from A- F,<br />

since the names of the teachers were not displayed anywhere. (See Appendix<br />

E representing the rubric used to compare the findings from each class).<br />

The findings for class A revealed that the students relied on the teacher<br />

for their motivation because the teacher was mentioned as a motivating<br />

factor many times. Students’ responses seemed to indicate that they needed<br />

to have their teacher encourage their self-motivation and goals in the class in<br />

order to learn. Generally, according to the researcher this teacher used most<br />

of the strategies that measure motivation Finally, the students were highly<br />

motivated by the teacher and there was good understanding and mutual trust<br />

between teacher and students. It can be seen that the students, while<br />

generally very positive, also indicated that the researcher’s observation<br />

captured some of their viewpoints too. Since the teacher possessed most of<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!