09.11.2014 Views

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SEEU</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Volume 5, No. 2, 2009<br />

which considered the new government too ‘anglophile’, the king decided<br />

after a while to return to his trusted aides and Frashëri government resigned<br />

after losing majority support in the Parliament (Fischer, 1996, pp. 258-260).<br />

The press freedom was further restricted. These were disappointing<br />

developments for the “young” intellectuals, who continued their battle in the<br />

press against the “old” bureaucrats for a while, till the invasion of the<br />

country by Italy.<br />

Alternatives from right and left<br />

In the 1930s some intellectuals thought that the “Occidentalization” of<br />

the country required a reorganization of the state and the political system of<br />

the monarchy in order to implement the desired reform. They began debating<br />

about political alternatives that would vitalize the existing “stagnant”<br />

institutions filled with “Oriental” bureaucrats. Still, most of them were<br />

careful to exempt the king from the open critiques and, indeed, to secure his<br />

approval and alliance for their projects.<br />

The right-wing clash in Europe in 1930s was reflected in these debates of<br />

Albanian intellectuals. What is striking is the lack of voices calling for the<br />

establishment of liberal democracy in the country. Of course, liberal<br />

democracy could not be articulated freely in the press due to the pressure by<br />

the government censors, but other reasons existed as well. Most of the<br />

intellectuals thought that the country was not fit for liberal democracy,<br />

because of its backwardness, lack of strong middle classes, lack of proper<br />

education, lack of tolerance, etc. They feared that the establishment of<br />

pluralism would degenerate into anarchy. A timid defense of political<br />

liberalism was articulated by Branko Merxhani, who advised for a gradual<br />

and disciplined path of monarchy towards liberal democracy, first by<br />

establishing a responsible press, which would form sound public opinion;<br />

after that allowing the direct election of candidates by ballot only in the<br />

major cities and, only when the time was ripe, the rural (i.e. the majority of)<br />

population could be enfranchised (Merxhani, 2003, p. 409; Koka, 1985, p.<br />

104). Even for his weak support of political liberalism in Albania, Merxhani<br />

attracted upon himself the wrath of other intellectuals; for example Krist<br />

Maloki called liberalism an “Oriental bazaar”, and he was in favor of an<br />

autocratic regime in Albania, like the one in Italy, or Austria at that time<br />

(Maloki, 2005, pp. 161-165).<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!