09.11.2014 Views

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dr. Ercan Gündoğan<br />

institutions cannot be justified without understanding the common purposes<br />

of the police. For example, the difference principle presupposes initial moral<br />

connections with common endeavour of community and it means only an<br />

instrument for some ends, which is something Rawls attempt to reject. It is<br />

an achievement of Rawls to demonstrate the priority of right over the good.<br />

The rights and liberties can be justified only against the background of<br />

comprehensive moral thoughts and of the conceptions of good society. This<br />

is also another idea Rawls tries to reject. Moreover, although Rawls rejects<br />

the comprehensive moral doctrines, his well-ordered society advances the<br />

goods of the members of the society and is thought to be regulated by a<br />

public conception of justice, which requires a general understanding and<br />

consent (Lassman, 1992, 213-4).<br />

It is observed that the general conception of justice in the distribution of<br />

social primary goods applies to the situation in which effective material<br />

equality, a certain basic level, is unavailable. Once this material minimum is<br />

available, the two principles of justice come into agenda. On the other hand,<br />

it is argued that the main part of the second principle, the difference<br />

principle, is related with the Rawls’ bias against the best-off in the original<br />

position while it is put forward to insure the idea of social cooperation. On<br />

the other hand, it is pointed out that considering the realities of the classdivided<br />

society, it can be seen that best-off class are the ruling class and<br />

cannot accept the constraints of the difference principle This class has an<br />

acute need to material wealth. Rawls presupposes a moderate class conflict<br />

without ruling class and class-based desires (Daniels, 1978, xxv- xxvi).<br />

When we consider research techniques of social sciences, empirical contents<br />

of history, society and political life put some constraints on TJ and its<br />

principles of justice. From the outset, Rawls’ free, rational and equal<br />

individuals ignore collective agency, the most importantly, the class<br />

(Daniels, 1978, xxix).<br />

The Basic Structure of Society and Primary Social Goods<br />

The primary subject matter of Rawls’ theory is the basic structure of<br />

society, which covers “major social institutions” that “distribute fundamental<br />

rights and duties and determine the division of advantages from social<br />

cooperation” (Rawls, 1971, 7). Political constitution, economic and social<br />

arrangements, legal system, competitive markets, private property in<br />

production and the monogamous family are counted as examples.<br />

Distributive role of justice is only a part of the conception of justice (Rawls,<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!