09.11.2014 Views

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SEEU</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Volume 5, No. 2, 2009<br />

success in SLA, particularly if this is measured by formal<br />

tests of linguistic competence (Ellis 1985:113).<br />

Skehan (2005) is of the opinion that aptitude should be equally relevant<br />

in second language contexts because learners have to face situations without<br />

pedagogical selection of materials. However, Krashen (1981) claims that<br />

aptitude is only relevant for instructed (learning-oriented) contexts.<br />

The question raised by many researchers is how to measure individual<br />

aptitude. Ellis (1985:112) explains that aptitude is usually defined on the<br />

basis of the Carroll and Sapon’s Modern Language Test (1959) and<br />

Pimsleur’s Language Aptitude Battery (1966). These two tests measure the<br />

learners’ characteristics such as: the ability to identify and memorize new<br />

sounds, the ability to understand how words function grammatically in<br />

sentences, and the ability to figure out grammatical rules from language<br />

samples and memory for new words (Lightbown and Spada1993). Dörnyei<br />

and Skehan (2005:596) provide a table where aptitude can be related to<br />

stages of information processing.<br />

Table 1: Taken from Dörnyei and Skehan (2005:597)<br />

SLA stage<br />

• Input processing strategies<br />

Such as segmentation<br />

• Noticing<br />

• Pattern identification<br />

• Pattern reconstructing and<br />

manipulation<br />

• Pattern control<br />

• Pattern integration<br />

Corresponding aptitude constructs<br />

Attentional control<br />

Working Memory<br />

Phonemic coding ability<br />

Working memory<br />

Phonemic coding ability<br />

Working memory<br />

Grammatical sensitivity<br />

Inductive language learning ability<br />

Grammatical sensitivity<br />

Inductive language learning ability<br />

Automatization<br />

Integrative memory<br />

Chunking Retrieval memory<br />

It can be seen from the table that learners differ in terms of aptitude.<br />

Noticing, for example, is an ability where learners differ. Some learners are<br />

more likely to notice relevant information than others, or some learners<br />

might have a better working memory than others. All other segments<br />

presented can be analyzed in a similar fashion (Dörnyei and Skehan 2005).<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!