SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mentor Hamiti, Visar Shehu and Agni Dika Tab. 1. Categorization according to the sonority of letters No The category of sonority Letters [1] Closed and deaf africant consonants p, t, k, q, c, ç [2] Pathway deaf consonants f, s, h, th, sh [3] Closed and africant loud consonants b, d, g, gj, x, xh [4] Pathway loud consonants v, z, dh, zh [5] Nose consonants m, n, nj [6] Side consonants l, ll [7] Fibrillation and medial consonants r, rr, j [8] Closed vowels i, u, y [9] Half opened vowels e, ë, o [10] Open vowels a With the categorization of letters according sonority, the number os syllables within the word can be determined and can also determine the limits of the division of the syllable. The syllable is determined by the maximum local of the sonorities, while the syllable division boundary is determined by the local minimum where it has voice declination. The following figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the application of this theory for the concrete division of the word university in the corresponding syllable: U- NI-VER-SI-TY where it is clearly noted that the number of syllables corresponds to the number of vowels and vowels simultaneously represent the maximum local sonority. While division boundaries between syllables are located in the local minimum, the declination of sonority represents the declination of voice. Fig. 1. The division of words into syllables according to the theory of sonority 180
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 The theory of sonority although correctly doing the sharing of words into syllables, in most cases cannot be generalised again because there are identified cases where the syllable boundaries are selected in the wrong way. Such is the case with the word song, which in the correct division kë-ngë , is divided into kën-gë. Finally, we can say that none of the three theories examined for syllables and their boundaries can be applied in a universal way to solve the problem of syllables in the Albanian language. III. The possibility of involvement of the computer in the identification of syllables Based on the theoretical knowledge of the syllables in the Albanian language and explanations of linguists about word division into syllables, it is reasonable to examine the possibility of involvement of computers in solving the problem in the context of finding a sustainable and universal solution for identification of the syllables and the division of words into syllables. III. 1. Difficulties over texts processing written in the Albanian language To examine this possibility, firstly the adequacy of the Albanian language should be analyzed, especially the Albanian alphabet for processing by computer because currently, most existing programs for text processing are dedicated to the English language and Latin alphabet. In this case, there is an important inclusion in the Albanian language of two diacritical letters “Ç ç” and “Ë ë” that do not belong in the Latin alphabet. These two letters are problematic for the usage of computers in writing them and for performing analysis on texts in the Albanian language. For this reason, because the standard keyboards contain only the 26 Latin characters, a compromise is found by using one of the following options: keyboard configuration, installation of fonts for text processors, or using codes for the generation of these two symbols. 181
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITETI I EVROPËS JUGLINDORE
Page 3:
Contents Foreword by the Editor in
Page 6:
UEJL për këshillat e tij në koh
Page 9 and 10:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 J
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 f
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 c
Page 19 and 20:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 j
Page 21 and 22:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 T
Page 23 and 24:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 a
Page 25 and 26:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 1
Page 27 and 28:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 c
Page 29 and 30:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 t
Page 31 and 32:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 e
Page 33 and 34:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 R
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 n
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 A
Page 43 and 44:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 w
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 i
Page 49 and 50:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 M
Page 51 and 52:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 G
Page 53 and 54:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009
Page 55 and 56:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 L
Page 57 and 58:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 m
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 t
Page 63 and 64:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 o
Page 65 and 66:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 g
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 A
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 H
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 S
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 h
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 H
Page 93 and 94:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 s
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 m
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 P
Page 103 and 104:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 I
Page 105 and 106:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 e
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 C
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 D
Page 115 and 116:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 g
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 d
Page 123 and 124:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 R
Page 125 and 126:
SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 S
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 W
Page 131 and 132: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 M
Page 133 and 134: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 I
Page 135 and 136: SEEU Review Volume 5, No. 2, 2009 9
Page 138 and 139: 138 Reviewers: Benjamin Keatinge Dr
Page 140 and 141: Iranda Bajrami, MA kanë qenë të
Page 142 and 143: Iranda Bajrami, MA a state of c
Page 144 and 145: Iranda Bajrami, MA to read and use
Page 146 and 147: Iranda Bajrami, MA Classrooms were
Page 148 and 149: Iranda Bajrami, MA the characterist
Page 150 and 151: Iranda Bajrami, MA Not all the t
Page 152 and 153: Iranda Bajrami, MA reinforce studen
Page 154 and 155: Iranda Bajrami, MA References 1. Am
Page 156 and 157: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix A Facto
Page 158 and 159: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix B Obser
Page 160 and 161: Iranda Bajrami, MA 22. Classroom en
Page 162 and 163: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix C Stude
Page 164 and 165: Iranda Bajrami, MA 9. 10. 11. 12. 1
Page 166 and 167: Iranda Bajrami, MA Appendix D Teach
Page 168 and 169: Iranda Bajrami, MA 18. 19. 20. 21.
Page 170 and 171: Iranda Bajrami, MA Consistent with
Page 172 and 173: 172 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Kadri Sule
Page 174 and 175: Mentor Hamiti, Visar Shehu and Agni
Page 194 and 195: 194 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Robert Sch
Page 196 and 197: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gezim Xhaferi and
Page 212 and 213: 212 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Selim Jusu
Page 214 and 215: Fatmir Faiku, Haxhere Faiku, Murtez
show all

SEEU Review vol. 5 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?