Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 83<br />
decade of the 19th century when African Americans founded a<br />
number of organizations that sought to preserve and publicize the<br />
legacy of the African diaspora through the theoretical refinement<br />
and more sophisticated analysis and interpretation of the mid 1980s.<br />
Harris’s stages of development set the parameters for an evaluation process<br />
and are enormously helpful in mapping and assessing the growth and current<br />
state of the field.<br />
In her “<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>: An Overview,” Darlene Clark Hine explores the<br />
nomenclature of the field: African American, Afro-American, Africana,<br />
<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>—titles evidencing the diversity of the field. Hine found, however,<br />
that although many programs sought to broaden geographical and disciplinary<br />
reach—that is, to fully explore the lives and experiences of peoples<br />
of African descent wherever they are on the globe—few possessed the resources<br />
or faculty to be truly Africana <strong>Studies</strong> programs. She cites the need<br />
to address such topics as curriculum, identity, mission, structure, graduate<br />
programs, faculty recruitment and retention, accreditation, and professionalization.<br />
Yet, by 1987, when Hine began her study, she found that White<br />
college administrators enthusiastically supported African American <strong>Studies</strong><br />
as the site that had racially diversified the university population and<br />
curriculum—notably, the study of <strong>Black</strong> women was then the new frontier<br />
of African American <strong>Studies</strong>.<br />
By contrast, Nellie McKay, in her “<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the Midwest” acknowledges<br />
a commitment among predominantly White institutions to<br />
strengthen African American <strong>Studies</strong> but questions the extent to which the<br />
field has been accepted in the scholarly community. She notes the backlash<br />
against African American <strong>Studies</strong>, <strong>Black</strong> faculty, and <strong>Black</strong> students on a<br />
number of campuses throughout the country. In addition, she identifies the<br />
special difficulty of recruiting <strong>Black</strong> scholars to the Midwest because of the<br />
lack of racial diversity within the region. (Here I assume she is not speaking<br />
of such major Midwestern cities as Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, or Cincinnati.)<br />
McKay is the first to take note of the impact of the “star system” on<br />
African American <strong>Studies</strong>, noting that few public institutions in the Midwest<br />
can afford academic superstars. To McKay, this system is good for individual