Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
66 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />
Many of the problems <strong>Black</strong> students complained of then and now are<br />
hard to distinguish from the kinds of complaints all students make. The college<br />
years are a difficult time of transition for young people. Separation from home<br />
and family, acceptance of adult responsibilities, the formation of new friendships<br />
and the loss of old ones, the challenging of one’s loyalties to family, class,<br />
and community, are problems everyone faces in these years. In the more prestigious<br />
colleges,individuals who had always been at the top in their classes in high<br />
schoolmaysuddenlyfindthattheyareunremarkable,evenmediocre,inthenew<br />
setting. These problems, common as they are, have a special impact on <strong>Black</strong><br />
students,who may view them as a“<strong>Black</strong> experience in a White institution”and<br />
seek to interpret as a collective condition what are basically individual and personal<br />
problems. As a result, many <strong>Black</strong> students continue to seek “identity” in<br />
courses about <strong>Black</strong> people, try to establish or maintain <strong>Black</strong> centers such as<br />
Wesleyan’s Malcolm X House, and work to effect community outreach programs<br />
in the local <strong>Black</strong> community. Insofar as they insist that Afro-<br />
American studies programs be the instrumentalities to achieve these ends,<br />
those programs will be weakened in their academic purpose and reputation. 44<br />
One of the principal arguments against the establishment of Afro-<br />
American studies was the claim that such programs would have the effect of<br />
“ghettoizing”boththefieldand<strong>Black</strong>academics.Byestablishingsuchdepartments,<br />
it was said, the traditional departments would be absolved of responsibilityforthatsubjectmatter.Theycouldremainaslily-Whiteinattitudeand<br />
faculty as they had always been, now with the assurance that whatever there<br />
was to the subject could be taught inAfro-American studies.It was also feared<br />
that the challenge of affirmative action could be met simply in the staffing of<br />
such departments. In the context of separatist and “<strong>Black</strong> Power” ideology,<br />
thesefearswerethemorecompelling.Theargumentwasthat,ironically,<strong>Black</strong><br />
<strong>Studies</strong> would prevent the broad study of Afro-American life and history in<br />
the standard curriculum and offer a way off the hook for faculties and departments<br />
reluctant to meet affirmative action criteria.<br />
It is impossible to know with certainty how this problem has been<br />
met. It is clear that in colleges following the program model, faculty and<br />
courses serving the program are based in departments. This, as I have<br />
pointed out, is one of the strengths of that model. Elsewhere it is unclear.