19.11.2014 Views

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />

Many of the problems <strong>Black</strong> students complained of then and now are<br />

hard to distinguish from the kinds of complaints all students make. The college<br />

years are a difficult time of transition for young people. Separation from home<br />

and family, acceptance of adult responsibilities, the formation of new friendships<br />

and the loss of old ones, the challenging of one’s loyalties to family, class,<br />

and community, are problems everyone faces in these years. In the more prestigious<br />

colleges,individuals who had always been at the top in their classes in high<br />

schoolmaysuddenlyfindthattheyareunremarkable,evenmediocre,inthenew<br />

setting. These problems, common as they are, have a special impact on <strong>Black</strong><br />

students,who may view them as a“<strong>Black</strong> experience in a White institution”and<br />

seek to interpret as a collective condition what are basically individual and personal<br />

problems. As a result, many <strong>Black</strong> students continue to seek “identity” in<br />

courses about <strong>Black</strong> people, try to establish or maintain <strong>Black</strong> centers such as<br />

Wesleyan’s Malcolm X House, and work to effect community outreach programs<br />

in the local <strong>Black</strong> community. Insofar as they insist that Afro-<br />

American studies programs be the instrumentalities to achieve these ends,<br />

those programs will be weakened in their academic purpose and reputation. 44<br />

One of the principal arguments against the establishment of Afro-<br />

American studies was the claim that such programs would have the effect of<br />

“ghettoizing”boththefieldand<strong>Black</strong>academics.Byestablishingsuchdepartments,<br />

it was said, the traditional departments would be absolved of responsibilityforthatsubjectmatter.Theycouldremainaslily-Whiteinattitudeand<br />

faculty as they had always been, now with the assurance that whatever there<br />

was to the subject could be taught inAfro-American studies.It was also feared<br />

that the challenge of affirmative action could be met simply in the staffing of<br />

such departments. In the context of separatist and “<strong>Black</strong> Power” ideology,<br />

thesefearswerethemorecompelling.Theargumentwasthat,ironically,<strong>Black</strong><br />

<strong>Studies</strong> would prevent the broad study of Afro-American life and history in<br />

the standard curriculum and offer a way off the hook for faculties and departments<br />

reluctant to meet affirmative action criteria.<br />

It is impossible to know with certainty how this problem has been<br />

met. It is clear that in colleges following the program model, faculty and<br />

courses serving the program are based in departments. This, as I have<br />

pointed out, is one of the strengths of that model. Elsewhere it is unclear.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!