Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 219<br />
tent to which African American <strong>Studies</strong> faculty carry inordinate teaching,<br />
mentoring, and administrative roles at most schools. (Suffice it to say that<br />
they are usually not rewarded accordingly.) Overwork is related to joint appointments;<br />
significant graduate degree supervision (or the recent addition<br />
of graduate programs to an already busy faculty and administrative overload)<br />
and administrative staffing problems associated with small, and<br />
often, shrinking budgets. The size of most of the units is fairly small, which<br />
makes a loss of even a single faculty member—through an outside offer, retirement,<br />
or movement to another unit within the university—highly<br />
destabilizing. As of 1997–98, many of the units hold tenured or tenuretrack<br />
faculty of twelve or fewer. Harvard has seven, Indiana twelve, Berkeley<br />
ten, and Wisconsin fifteen. Only UCLA had a faculty as sizable as twenty.<br />
Although these individuals are affiliated with the Center for African American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong>, their institutional homes are in other university units (usually,<br />
other departments). CAAS “owns” only six FTE, and the Afro-American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> degree program at UCLA has only recently been authorized to participate<br />
in joint appointments.<br />
It is also crucial to grasp the wide range of environments in which these<br />
departments and centers function. Berkeley’s African American <strong>Studies</strong> department<br />
is one of the more complex institutional settings. It holds departmental<br />
status and coexists with a Center for African <strong>Studies</strong> and an Ethnic<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> department, which contains subfields in Asian American, Native<br />
American, and Chicano <strong>Studies</strong>. Berkeley has recently added a new American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> program,which has depended uponAfricanAmerican <strong>Studies</strong> faculty<br />
and course offerings without, it appears, contributing additional resources to<br />
the department. In contrast, at Harvard, the Afro-American <strong>Studies</strong> department’s<br />
faculty are jointly appointed. Furthermore, there exist two competing<br />
Ethnic <strong>Studies</strong> units on campus withAfrican <strong>Studies</strong> holding subordinate status<br />
as a committee administered by faculty who are generally affiliated with<br />
African American <strong>Studies</strong>. With such complexities as these, it is not unimaginable<br />
that some African American <strong>Studies</strong> units might wither away from lack<br />
of aggressive, committed leadership or from a lack of faculty willing to make<br />
the professional sacrifices necessary to keep such units functioning.