19.11.2014 Views

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 35<br />

<strong>Black</strong> Student Alliance at Yale had been working, without much success, to<br />

convince the college of the need for courses in Afro-American history and<br />

culture. Early in the spring of 1968, they decided to sponsor a conference<br />

that would draw nationally upon White and <strong>Black</strong> intellectuals having<br />

something to say about the subject. One of the student organizers, Armstead<br />

Robinson, has written: “We viewed this symposium as an opportunity<br />

to create an atmosphere in which those persons who were in pivotal<br />

positions ... could engage in active and open intellectual exchanges on<br />

questions related to Afro-American studies.” 17<br />

Supported by funds from the <strong>Ford</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong>, this symposium to educate<br />

the educators brought together a wide spectrum of opinion (all favorable<br />

to some form of Afro-American studies). Some, like Nathan Hare and<br />

the “cultural nationalist” Maulana Ron Karenga (of UCLA), were deeply<br />

anti-intellectual and hostile to the academy. These were offset by such selfconscious<br />

intellectuals and committed academics as Martin Kilson, Harold<br />

Cruse, and Boniface Obichere. The result was a provocative conference that<br />

gave the Yale community a chance to compare several differing concepts of<br />

<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> and to identify the one that might work best at Yale.<br />

The development of the Yale program was helped most by the constructive<br />

attitude of the university’s senior faculty and the deft leadership of its administration,<br />

out of which a program emerged that was an integral part of the<br />

life of the institution.Several of the major departments (including history,English,<br />

and anthropology) supplied faculty and courses to the program, and the<br />

administration allocated the funds to make that possible. Such a program required<br />

trust and respect by all parties.Whatever the reasons that Yale had those<br />

qualities, they were hard to come by at other institutions. The result is that others<br />

have had to suffer painful periods of adjustment to get to the point at which<br />

Yale was able to start.After more than a decade,some are just now getting there.<br />

Harvard University<br />

Harvard’s program might have gone the way of Yale’s except for bad timing,<br />

bad luck, and perhaps excessive distrust on the part of some of those concerned.<br />

Like Yale, Harvard began working on the problem in the spring of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!