Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 35<br />
<strong>Black</strong> Student Alliance at Yale had been working, without much success, to<br />
convince the college of the need for courses in Afro-American history and<br />
culture. Early in the spring of 1968, they decided to sponsor a conference<br />
that would draw nationally upon White and <strong>Black</strong> intellectuals having<br />
something to say about the subject. One of the student organizers, Armstead<br />
Robinson, has written: “We viewed this symposium as an opportunity<br />
to create an atmosphere in which those persons who were in pivotal<br />
positions ... could engage in active and open intellectual exchanges on<br />
questions related to Afro-American studies.” 17<br />
Supported by funds from the <strong>Ford</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong>, this symposium to educate<br />
the educators brought together a wide spectrum of opinion (all favorable<br />
to some form of Afro-American studies). Some, like Nathan Hare and<br />
the “cultural nationalist” Maulana Ron Karenga (of UCLA), were deeply<br />
anti-intellectual and hostile to the academy. These were offset by such selfconscious<br />
intellectuals and committed academics as Martin Kilson, Harold<br />
Cruse, and Boniface Obichere. The result was a provocative conference that<br />
gave the Yale community a chance to compare several differing concepts of<br />
<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> and to identify the one that might work best at Yale.<br />
The development of the Yale program was helped most by the constructive<br />
attitude of the university’s senior faculty and the deft leadership of its administration,<br />
out of which a program emerged that was an integral part of the<br />
life of the institution.Several of the major departments (including history,English,<br />
and anthropology) supplied faculty and courses to the program, and the<br />
administration allocated the funds to make that possible. Such a program required<br />
trust and respect by all parties.Whatever the reasons that Yale had those<br />
qualities, they were hard to come by at other institutions. The result is that others<br />
have had to suffer painful periods of adjustment to get to the point at which<br />
Yale was able to start.After more than a decade,some are just now getting there.<br />
Harvard University<br />
Harvard’s program might have gone the way of Yale’s except for bad timing,<br />
bad luck, and perhaps excessive distrust on the part of some of those concerned.<br />
Like Yale, Harvard began working on the problem in the spring of