Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 191<br />
and Ph.D. degree programs in Asian <strong>Studies</strong> and Latin American <strong>Studies</strong>—<br />
not in African <strong>Studies</strong>.<br />
In terms of its course offerings, the African American <strong>Studies</strong> department<br />
maintains a somewhat uneasy relationship with the Center for the<br />
Teaching and Study of American Cultures, which oversees the approval of<br />
courses that can be used to satisfy the breadth requirement in American<br />
Cultures that Berkeley instituted in 1991. A sizable number of the department’s<br />
regular offerings are on the list of approved American Cultures<br />
courses, which has resulted in an increase in enrollment. At the same time,<br />
it is unclear whether a significant portion of the resources allocated to the<br />
American Cultures Center to support the creation and reworking of<br />
courses has flowed to the African American <strong>Studies</strong> department.<br />
Possibly as a result of the decreasing enrollment of African American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> students in the wake of anti-affirmative action legislation in California,<br />
there appears to be a drop in the number of African American <strong>Studies</strong><br />
majors; meanwhile, enrollments in the department’s courses remain<br />
high as students take them to fulfill their breadth requirements. There is<br />
some apprehension that should this trend continue, the department would<br />
gradually become something akin to a service unit. Some faculty members<br />
also noted the change in classroom dynamics as a result of the influx of nonmajor<br />
students who might never have enrolled in the department’s courses<br />
were it not for the American Cultures requirement. That courses approved<br />
for this requirement have to be comparative has likely affected the design of<br />
some offerings in Ethnic <strong>Studies</strong> and African American <strong>Studies</strong> as well.<br />
What is clear amidst these intricate, interlocking institutional networks<br />
is that the faculty in Ethnic <strong>Studies</strong> generally and in African American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> in particular are mightily overworked. The Ethnic <strong>Studies</strong><br />
department, which houses fifteen FTE, has the highest student-faculty ratio<br />
in the Social Sciences Division. The faculty in African American <strong>Studies</strong> is<br />
likewise stretched quite thin. For example, the Chair of the department<br />
teaches five courses a year to help staff the curriculum.<br />
One part of the problem is the sheer volume and diversity of the academic<br />
workload that the department has to bear. In 1996–97 the unit