19.11.2014 Views

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 51<br />

question of power. Would the university give to <strong>Black</strong>s (students included)<br />

the power imagined to exist in a department or college? In some ways, the<br />

answer to this question was more important to those making the demand<br />

than was the substance of the program or the efficacy of such “autonomous”<br />

agencies in achieving academic objectives. “<strong>Black</strong> Power” also<br />

informed the demand for <strong>Black</strong> dormitories, student centers, and the like.<br />

Community building implied the coming together of <strong>Black</strong> people on<br />

and off campus as a community. In this regard, it is important to observe<br />

that these students were unknown to one another before coming to college<br />

and were often from places that, at best, were disintegrating communities.<br />

They were the more anxious, therefore, to tie themselves to the local<br />

<strong>Black</strong> community as a defense against the perceived co-opting pressures of<br />

the institution.<br />

On the positive side, “<strong>Black</strong> Power” proponents claimed that <strong>Black</strong>s<br />

had the ability and the obligation to create their own world on their own<br />

terms (just as Whites had done). On the negative side, “<strong>Black</strong> Power” was<br />

an attitude deliberately inhospitable to Whites. One wanted <strong>Black</strong>s on the<br />

faculty, of course, but especially to teach courses in Afro-American studies.<br />

<strong>Black</strong> faculty would have a perspective different from Whites. More<br />

important, the appointment of <strong>Black</strong> faculty and the control of the Afro-<br />

American studies program by <strong>Black</strong>s would be a delivery of power into<br />

<strong>Black</strong> hands. Some argued that Whites had nothing of value to say about<br />

<strong>Black</strong>s and that the program should be controlled by <strong>Black</strong>s without interference<br />

from White faculty and administration.<br />

Some programs—notably at the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle<br />

and at Cornell—kept a strong “<strong>Black</strong> Power” orientation. Since the decline<br />

of interest in <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the mid-seventies, supporters have<br />

seldom talked of autonomy, turning, rather, to guarantees of continued<br />

university support. Most of those that started with separatist notions either<br />

expired or moderated their positions.<br />

Separatism—Cultural Nationalism<br />

This aspect of separatist ideology was of slight real influence on college<br />

campuses but should be mentioned to distinguish it from that of “<strong>Black</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!