19.11.2014 Views

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 7<br />

West, Michael Eric Dyson, bell hooks, and others. Significantly, these three<br />

stories presented different perspectives on African American <strong>Studies</strong>: Gates<br />

represented a kind of liberal multiculturalism, Asante Afrocentrism, and the<br />

various scholars featured in the Atlantic Monthly range from the conservative<br />

Glenn Loury to the more leftist Cornel West or the feminist bell hooks.<br />

Even though these more visible developments greatly affected the way<br />

the field was seen by the world outside of the academy, major tremors were<br />

taking place within as well. On the one hand, <strong>Black</strong> women scholars challenged<br />

the field’s masculinist biases and in so doing helped to bring together<br />

critical discourses of race and gender. On the other hand, with the<br />

founding of the first Ph.D. in African American <strong>Studies</strong>, Afrocentric scholars<br />

secured a foothold in the academy. Although Afrocentricity was little<br />

felt within the elite academy, it exerted a major influence on African American<br />

<strong>Studies</strong> nationwide and in nonacademic <strong>Black</strong> institutions, such as<br />

Afrocentric charter schools (and public school curricula), spiritual and religious<br />

rituals, and rites of passage programs for young people. 5 Although<br />

a few <strong>Black</strong> public intellectuals received positive media coverage, Afrocentric<br />

scholars were often harshly criticized and caricatured in the mainstream<br />

press, which gave a great deal of attention to the most extreme and<br />

controversial stances and figures in the field.<br />

The Pipeline<br />

Although the field gained more visibility within and outside of the academy,<br />

there was still a dearth of young African Americans pursuing Ph.D.s.<br />

In 1985, the <strong>Ford</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong> committed resources to address the pipeline<br />

problem by adding predoctoral and dissertation fellowships to their postdoctoral<br />

fellowship programs for underrepresented minorities. This program,<br />

administered by the National Academy of Sciences, joined a long line<br />

of <strong>Ford</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong> initiatives devoted to <strong>Black</strong> faculty. Earlier programs<br />

provided resources for faculty development at historically <strong>Black</strong> colleges<br />

and universities, but by 1969 eligibility was expanded to include <strong>Black</strong> faculty<br />

at any institution of higher education.Also in 1969, a doctoral program

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!