Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 55<br />
own faculty and staff, design its own curriculum, and service its student<br />
concentrators without any control or oversight by others. It was also assumed<br />
to be a more permanent structure than a program. Some institutions<br />
established Afro-American studies departments without much ado.<br />
In others, like Harvard, departmental status remained a bone of contention<br />
years after it was established. The more it was resisted, of course, the more<br />
it appeared to be worth fighting for and defending.<br />
The argument against it was mainly that a department normally represented<br />
a discipline. Afro-American studies, being interdisciplinary in<br />
character, should, critics said, be organized into a program made up of faculty<br />
from the various departments serving it. Its defenders most often<br />
claimed it was a discipline defined by its particular perspective on a topic<br />
none of the other departments offered.In these terms the argument was tendentious.<br />
As defined by the nineteenth-century German university, departments<br />
were identical with academic disciplines. By 1969, however, that had<br />
ceased to be true of American university departments. Interdisciplinary departments<br />
had developed within the sciences, and occasionally area studies<br />
were departmentally organized.On the other hand,a perspective,which was<br />
what Afro-American studies offered, could hardly be thought of as a discipline.<br />
Whatever it once was, a department is now largely an administrative<br />
convenience. Afro-American studies departments have worked reasonably<br />
well in some institutions, Berkeley and the University of Indiana being examples.<br />
It did not work well at Harvard, and its problems illuminate some<br />
of the weaknesses of the model.<br />
Departmental autonomy, it turns out, is not as absolute as some believed.<br />
Such autonomy as exists carries problems. Under a program, the<br />
president and dean can, in effect, direct departments to make searches and<br />
appoint competent faculty approved by the program’s committee. The department<br />
has the power and budget to make recommendations for appointment,<br />
but, lacking other arrangements, it must find scholars willing<br />
to take positions in Afro-American studies alone. In practice, most senior<br />
scholars with major reputations insist on joint appointments with the departments<br />
of their discipline. So, most often, an Afro-American studies department’s<br />
appointment is contingent on another department’s approval of