19.11.2014 Views

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States 55<br />

own faculty and staff, design its own curriculum, and service its student<br />

concentrators without any control or oversight by others. It was also assumed<br />

to be a more permanent structure than a program. Some institutions<br />

established Afro-American studies departments without much ado.<br />

In others, like Harvard, departmental status remained a bone of contention<br />

years after it was established. The more it was resisted, of course, the more<br />

it appeared to be worth fighting for and defending.<br />

The argument against it was mainly that a department normally represented<br />

a discipline. Afro-American studies, being interdisciplinary in<br />

character, should, critics said, be organized into a program made up of faculty<br />

from the various departments serving it. Its defenders most often<br />

claimed it was a discipline defined by its particular perspective on a topic<br />

none of the other departments offered.In these terms the argument was tendentious.<br />

As defined by the nineteenth-century German university, departments<br />

were identical with academic disciplines. By 1969, however, that had<br />

ceased to be true of American university departments. Interdisciplinary departments<br />

had developed within the sciences, and occasionally area studies<br />

were departmentally organized.On the other hand,a perspective,which was<br />

what Afro-American studies offered, could hardly be thought of as a discipline.<br />

Whatever it once was, a department is now largely an administrative<br />

convenience. Afro-American studies departments have worked reasonably<br />

well in some institutions, Berkeley and the University of Indiana being examples.<br />

It did not work well at Harvard, and its problems illuminate some<br />

of the weaknesses of the model.<br />

Departmental autonomy, it turns out, is not as absolute as some believed.<br />

Such autonomy as exists carries problems. Under a program, the<br />

president and dean can, in effect, direct departments to make searches and<br />

appoint competent faculty approved by the program’s committee. The department<br />

has the power and budget to make recommendations for appointment,<br />

but, lacking other arrangements, it must find scholars willing<br />

to take positions in Afro-American studies alone. In practice, most senior<br />

scholars with major reputations insist on joint appointments with the departments<br />

of their discipline. So, most often, an Afro-American studies department’s<br />

appointment is contingent on another department’s approval of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!