Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
196 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />
Phyllis Bischoff suggested that a Library Science focus be developed<br />
within the African American <strong>Studies</strong> degree program. Given the growth in<br />
the field and the revolution in how libraries function based on dramatic<br />
changes in information technology, these proposals seem especially apt.<br />
The Cooperative Africana Microform Project, currently underway, is a collaboration<br />
of more than thirty libraries. Administered by the University of<br />
Chicago and the Center for Research Libraries, it digitizes newspapers and<br />
journals for use as online resources.<br />
Reviewers’ Recommendations<br />
The department might address the extent to which its faculty is overworked<br />
by monitoring its FTEs more effectively. One complicated aspect of this<br />
problem involves the use of its faculty to support graduate work in other<br />
departments that have neither joint appointments nor permit African<br />
American <strong>Studies</strong> faculty to chair dissertation committees. Before the department<br />
had its own doctoral program, this sort of unrewarded service on<br />
the part of its faculty was understandable. However, it constitutes a major<br />
drain on faculty time when the African American <strong>Studies</strong> doctoral program<br />
is going to constitute an increasing demand for faculty attention. Perhaps<br />
some negotiation with other departments might prove fruitful.<br />
University of California, Los Angeles<br />
Cultural <strong>Studies</strong> in the African Diaspora Project<br />
UCLA’s <strong>Ford</strong>-funded Cultural <strong>Studies</strong> in the African Diaspora Project<br />
(CSADP) set out to “encourage an extensive dialogue between humanists<br />
and social scientists working in African American <strong>Studies</strong>, ... Cultural<br />
<strong>Studies</strong>, and African <strong>Studies</strong>” envisioning them as clearly compatible. “Ideally,”<br />
wrote Valerie Smith and Marcyliena Morgan, “both areas challenge<br />
disciplinary boundaries, situate cultural processes and productions within<br />
the context of social and political relations, and expand the body of texts<br />
available for scholarly consideration.” Ideally, too, both endeavored “to en-