Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
224 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />
of African American <strong>Studies</strong> graduate programs for a discussion of goals<br />
and strategies for dealing with student financial aid, collaboration with<br />
other departments on campus, curricula, introductory courses, job placement,<br />
research planning, and the like. One can envision the benefits to be<br />
gained from a published volume of papers from such a meeting—especially<br />
one appended with syllabi and program descriptions. 37<br />
Finally, the <strong>Foundation</strong> might itself take on the creation and maintenance<br />
of a database of information regarding AAS graduate programs or,<br />
in the alternative, provide the funds necessary for an AAS program to set<br />
up such a database. In sum, greater intellectual consistency will be crucial<br />
in order to facilitate and sustain the construction of graduate programs that<br />
will produce scholars promote the field across narrow disciplinary lines.<br />
The response to the renaissance of the Department of Afro-American<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> at Harvard raises the issue of intellectual consistency. First, there is<br />
no single or dominant disciplinary organization. Faculty participates in the<br />
National Council for <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> (NCBS), the Association for the Study<br />
of Afro-American Life and History (ASALH), the American <strong>Studies</strong> Association,<br />
and national disciplinary organizations. These groups reflect generational<br />
differences, philosophical distinctions, and differently designed<br />
intellectual approaches. In a number of cases, we found that units had their<br />
own networks but did not consistently interact with each other. In other<br />
cases, the <strong>Ford</strong> grant stimulated outreach. UVa’s Woodson Center reached<br />
out to regional HBCUs; Cornell’s Africana <strong>Studies</strong> and Research Center<br />
partnered with regional colleges and universities, and an HBCU several<br />
states away. And, at Wisconsin, an African American <strong>Studies</strong> consortium<br />
was created linking Midwestern universities: Carnegie Mellon Michigan,<br />
and Michigan State. The University of Pennsylvania and Princeton University<br />
have also formed an alliance, inspired by a <strong>Ford</strong> grant.<br />
Another important collaboration that we encountered in our review<br />
involved linkages being established between large research universities and<br />
small colleges. The Woodson Institute at the University of Virginia had<br />
taken a leadership role in developing a regional consortium “of schools interested<br />
in sharing resources and developing programs related to African