Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />
conflict over departmental status—have tended to enjoy the easiest relationship<br />
in their academic communities. For the others, the legacy of conflict<br />
and bickering about status and legitimacy have continued to be<br />
troublesome. Evaluations and judgments about every program must therefore<br />
be made in the context of its particular college and history. At schools<br />
like Berkeley, Cornell, Columbia, and Harvard, the events of 1968 through<br />
1970 deeply divided the faculty; bitterness stemming from those divisions<br />
remains,though muted and controlled.Issues and problems related to Afro-<br />
American studies continue to provoke emotional rather than reasoned responses.<br />
In most places, however, the programs are accepted as “here to<br />
stay,” so both hostility and anxiety tend to be more latent than overt. 40<br />
The history of the efforts to establish Afro-American studies makes us<br />
aware of how deeply conservative faculties are. Change is usually very slow<br />
in academic institutions, and most conflict is resolved by consensus. In this<br />
sense, Afro-American studies was a shock to the system. In the past, new departments<br />
(biochemistry, for instance) were created only after years of development<br />
within established disciplines; the production of scholarship<br />
and fresh knowledge was antecedent to, and justification for, the new department.<br />
Even so, there was friction and dissent. It was many years before<br />
English departments acknowledged the importance of American literature,<br />
and many advocates of the establishment of American studies programs (or<br />
departments) have failed to overcome resistance to what some see as their<br />
novelty. Little wonder that Afro-American studies had a chilly reception.<br />
Many scholars—some out of ignorance and bigotry, others out of healthy<br />
skepticism—wondered whether there was enough there to make a field of<br />
study. Many have yet to be convinced. Those scholars of Afro-American life,<br />
history, and culture who are careless of and indifferent to the opinions of<br />
Whites and <strong>Black</strong>s outside their fields will not convince many skeptics. Others,<br />
however, are successfully influencing the scholarly community. Most<br />
often, they are based in the more viable Afro-American studies programs<br />
and, to my mind, constitute the strongest argument for such programs.<br />
With falling enrollments and the budget crunch, there has been considerable<br />
anxiety that Afro-American programs will lose support within<br />
the university. Anxiety has been increased by the fact that most such pro-