Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
Inclusive Scholarship: Developing Black Studies - Ford Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52 <strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>Scholarship</strong>: <strong>Developing</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> in the United States<br />
Power.” “<strong>Black</strong> Power” advocates believed it possible to negotiate with and<br />
otherwise relate to Whites on the basis of power; cultural nationalists like<br />
Maulana Ron Karenga of UCLA did not. Like the “<strong>Black</strong> Power” advocates,<br />
Karenga placed great emphasis on community building among <strong>Black</strong>s, but<br />
he went further in assuming two nations and two cultures—one White and<br />
one <strong>Black</strong>. Even while attached to the university Karenga was deeply antagonistic<br />
to it, especially to its efforts to be helpful to <strong>Black</strong> people. His model<br />
was a colonial one: <strong>Black</strong>s, as he saw it, were emerging from colonial status<br />
into nationhood. The university’s proper role, he maintained, was (1)“nonintervention”<br />
in the <strong>Black</strong> community, with no efforts to influence it or<br />
shape it; (2) separation—as an institution of the former colonizing power,<br />
the university should deliver financial and technical aid but only as <strong>Black</strong><br />
people demanded it; and (3) the creation of a movement to civilize White<br />
people. While such notions were not central to <strong>Black</strong> student thought, they<br />
did inform some of the rhetoric. 33 As we shall see, such ideological presuppositions<br />
defined the form as well as the style the new programs took.<br />
Typical Models<br />
The models on which Afro-American studies programs were built were influenced<br />
by ideology and conditions on individual campuses. Naturally,<br />
each particular form had intrinsic strengths and weaknesses.<br />
The Program<br />
From an academic point of view, the “program” approach has been the<br />
most successful. It acknowledges the interdisciplinary character of Afro-<br />
American studies by using faculty from established departments. It relies<br />
on the president and the dean to guarantee the program through budget allocations<br />
to the departments involved. While a faculty member’s appointment<br />
may be principally to offer courses and service to Afro-American<br />
studies, his or her membership remains within the department of discipline.<br />
By definition, all senior faculty in a program are jointly appointed to