10.01.2015 Views

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

115<br />

more importance on "means" and implementation as compared to the earlier ones<br />

characterized by unrealistic idealism. The construction of these conceptional cities were to<br />

be attained through the mass production methods made possible by modern technology.<br />

This approach was summarized in Le Corbusier's Toward a New Architecture (1925).<br />

Another approach took the form of extensive central government planning as<br />

exemplified by the British and Western European experiments in new towns. By bringing<br />

public-owned land under state planning agencies, development plans are drafted and<br />

mechanisms for private participation are laid down. In these examples, public ownership is<br />

the key. For instance, Stockholm's ownership of vast vacant land made possible the<br />

development of housing as well as the public transportation system and are good examples<br />

of comprehensive planning. While commended for providing accessibility to the elderly<br />

and the politically underrepresentated groups such as teenagers and housewives, planned<br />

public development has been criticized for several shortcomings including imposing<br />

"technocratic concepts upon a passive clientele...unpopular high-rise housing, a neglect of<br />

social facilities, and in the U.S. extensive displacement of the poor in the interests of<br />

subsidized commercial development." 15<br />

During the 1930s and 1940s, the controversy over the need for government<br />

intervention to bring direct social change and to maximize socially desirable ends reached<br />

its peak. The proponents for intervention included Karl Mannheim, Rexford Tugwell, and<br />

Barbra Wooton who confronted free market laissezfaire supporters represented by<br />

Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig Von Mises. For them, the debate seemingly settled on the<br />

need for planning in a capitalist society. In a free-market democratic society, the argument<br />

for planning has been justified on four grounds. Firstly, the economic justification is based<br />

on the widely accepted view that markets cannot perfectly attain competitiveness (i.e. the<br />

Pareto efficient allocation is not realized) and due to the notion .of 'market failure'. Both<br />

classical and neoclassical economists have agreed that even perfectly competitive markets<br />

suffer from the presence of (i) public goods, (ii) externalities (spillovers), (iii) prisoners'<br />

dilemma situations (a case in which one's pursuit of his own self interest does not lead to<br />

an optimal outcome for society), and (iv) distributional issues. 16<br />

In short, modern urban planning in Europe and North America was born in response<br />

to the industrial revolution and the squalid conditions brought by the shift from cottage<br />

industry to the large factory mass production enlisting throngs of the working class. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!