10.01.2015 Views

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

Dissertation_Dr Faisal Almubarak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

Najdi town rulers set the pace for those who lived under their influence in the towns and<br />

associated farm hinterlands, tribal chiefs shared power with the town's squirearchies, a<br />

balance that was evident in the symbiosis the two major societal powers maintained. This<br />

multiplicity of power precluded the emergence of a political leviathan that could impose<br />

itself on all and manipulate the isolated regions' population into one nation. Within Riyadh<br />

proper, social power was crystalized in the ruler and an upper privileged class comprising<br />

the religious strata. Both commanded the key positions in the social structure.<br />

Riyadh was a subsystem, it was part of the broader social order comprising rural<br />

areas and pastoral nomads. In addition to its' somewhat more developed physical<br />

structure, Riyadh's political vitality and economic centrality supported a social structure<br />

constituting craftsmen, merchants, clergy and political aristocracy whose matrimonial<br />

lineages both contributed to its prominence and determined the status of other families in<br />

the town. Unlike the conjugal family unit characterizing the class structure of an industrial<br />

society, the Najdi family structure was rigid, one which was based on the extended family<br />

system which in turn fit into a complex network of a larger tribal organization, sometimes<br />

straddling both those of towns and the nomads. The family was a comparatively closed<br />

and inward-oriented, patriarchal unit. The husband ruled the unit and presided over its<br />

outside engagements. The women spent a great deal of their daily life in familia tasks<br />

within the confines of the household or the farm.<br />

The traditional (Najdi) society, though classless and casteless in the literal sense, has<br />

a social division of classes that has been maintained for centuries. The ruling elite derived<br />

their command and power from a well established tribal majority. The larger families<br />

whose members belonged to known tribal branches are derived from and organized into<br />

gabilis, locals who belong to well-established and extended families whose pedigrees are<br />

documented. There are also the khadhiris, families of "doubtful" origins. They do not<br />

belong to the known Arab tribes. They descended from one or a combination of African,<br />

Persian, or Indian origins and the like. There was also the slave population, largely of<br />

African descent. They were bought or exchanged in the barter economy of Arabia or taken<br />

as prisoners of war. These social divisions were deeply entrenched in the social fabric and<br />

straddled both the social and economic spheres, so much so that some occupations became<br />

associated with each social group. However, it must be noted that due to Islamic<br />

teachings, a degradation into a caste-like segmentation was drastically alleviated. Sjoberg<br />

(1960) agrees. He stated "Undoubtedly, the egalitarian orientation of the traditional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!