31.03.2015 Views

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

concessions have been made. However, talks can be kept going either by coming up<br />

with a creative tactic or sticking to your decision. This can be done in the following<br />

ways:<br />

Coming Up With New Options<br />

When negotiations stall because a stalemate has been reached, it is advisable to<br />

look for alternatives to solve the problerus. Both parties should engage in this exercise<br />

unless the other party is no more willing to do this. Then you should come up with an<br />

alternative. Such a problem is caused by the fact that during the planning stage it is not<br />

easy to foresee and plan for such a situation.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> a difference <strong>of</strong> opinion because <strong>of</strong> price, Fuller (1992) suggests<br />

that delivery dates should be stretched out and product and packaging specifications<br />

relaxed. The quantities <strong>of</strong>items bought should be decreased or increased and provision<br />

made for additional quantities. Performance, cost and delivery incentives should be<br />

increased as well as more favourable items. Sometimes it may be necessary to<br />

restructure the negotiation so that the final agreement is quite different from the original<br />

plan. It may also be necessary to agree to what may be important to another party,<br />

although it may not mean much to you. Fuller (1992) makes an example <strong>of</strong>a seller who<br />

agrees to sell his property but keeps remembering how he enjoyed owning the property.<br />

The buyer then agrees to make him a manager <strong>of</strong>the property ifhe sells it. In this way a<br />

deal is struck.<br />

During the negotiations towards democracy in South Africa a similar situation<br />

developed where options had to be modified. After the March 17,1992 referendum<br />

where Mr De Klerk obtained majority support to continue negotiating with the ANC, he<br />

presented to CODESA a proposal for a two-phase transition where CODESA would<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!