View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

from an anthropological point of view it was never really done from actual emotional
performance.
According to Lutz and Abu-Lughod (1990) interest has only recently started to
be shown on Sapir's view of the pervasiveness of emotional expression in linguistic
expression. Lutz and Abu-Lughod cite the research of Irvine (1990), who bases her
research on the study of registers which she calls "varieties according to use" in
contrast with dialects which are "varieties according to users" (Lutz and Abu-Lughod
1990:127). According to them Irvine (1990) investigates it from an interactional point
of view on research done in rural Senegal in a Wolof community. Some American
linguists and sociolinguists preferred the term linguistic variety and code. The registers
display certain linguistic characteristics ofa community ofspeakers.
Irvine (1990) emphasises that recent anthropological approaches to the study of
emotion have always put emphasis on the contextual approach i.e. emotions arise and
are displayed in social situations and to understand emotions one needs to understand
the social relations that one is experiencing and that define oneself. Important also is
the role of linguistic convention, which provides resources from which one can choose
when one wants to display emotions, how others and the framework of interpretation
will interpret his behaviour. (Lutz and Abu-Lughod 1990:131) This expression of
feelings helps to promote social relationships.
In chapter 3, when the nature of emotions was discussed, it was clear that there
IS no unanimity concerning emotions. This was based on LeDoux and Steinberg's
VIews. It was also clear that there are no fundamental emotions. The scientific
description of emotions IS subjective, but pretends to be objective. Subjective
53