31.03.2015 Views

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sources. ill this case it is not their intention to tell lies. Ekman (1999) excludes in this<br />

definition a pathological liar who lies compulsively without intending to do so.<br />

A second characteristic <strong>of</strong>a liar is that he does not inform his audience about his<br />

intention to mislead, like Uri Geller who did not tell his audience that his tricks were<br />

magic. Sometimes a lie is implied in the framing <strong>of</strong> the situation as in the expression<br />

"let the buyer beware", which means what is on <strong>of</strong>fer may not be what it is supposed to<br />

be. Sometimes even ifit is suspected that lies are being told it may be improper to ask.<br />

Ekman (1999) does not consider false statements as lies, but also if a person<br />

withholds or conceals information purposely, then he is considered as lying. This can<br />

be the case in a negotiation situation when a negotiator does not reveal that he does not<br />

have decision-making powers. To Ekman (1999) concealment or falsification is two<br />

techniques used by liars to mislead their targets. Another technique <strong>of</strong> misleading the<br />

target is by telling the truth in such a way that it seems to mean the opposite <strong>of</strong>what it<br />

means, like a man replying to his wife's question about the women he may have met on<br />

his business trip. He may say he slept with a different woman every night, and maybe<br />

with two women on certain days.<br />

Another technique is telling half a truth, like saying a person is nice instead <strong>of</strong><br />

saying you are in love with him. Yet another technique is what Ekman (1999) calls<br />

"incorrect inference dodge" where you may, for example, sing praises about someone's<br />

attire when you actually do not like it. When there is notification given about an<br />

intention not to reveal information, that is secrecy. Sometimes the deceiver can mislead<br />

himself but not realise it, or not know why he is deceiving himself e.g. when a motorist<br />

is aware <strong>of</strong> a mechanical problem in his car, but because he does not have enough<br />

money for repairs he tells himself that after all it is not such a major problem.<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!