27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 Child Labour in Latin America<br />

tackle the problem, although this has slowly been changing (Boyden<br />

and Rialp, 1995, p. 183; Lansky, 1997, p. 241). This is demonstrated by<br />

the international concerted efforts that have been undertaken – at least<br />

in theory – to combat the worst forms <strong>of</strong> child labour. Since poverty is<br />

cited time and again as the main reason why children work, the link<br />

between the two merits a closer examination. 15 Poverty and child<br />

labour are linked in that child labour is a response to poverty; children<br />

have to work to support themselves and their families. 16 However, the<br />

ILO argues that child labour perpetuates poverty in that it generates<br />

poorly skilled adults who will only be able to work in low-wage labour<br />

and it might also stunt the physical and intellectual development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>new</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> workers. This is referred to as the ‘life-cycle poverty<br />

trap’ (ILO, 1997).<br />

Relationship between children and work<br />

Two main views on the relationship between children and work<br />

emerge from the literature. <strong>The</strong> first view, which has determined much<br />

<strong>of</strong> the discourse on child labour, holds that childhood and work are<br />

incompatible. <strong>The</strong> second view, which is more progressive than the first,<br />

holds that children have a right to work, while work is understood as<br />

a valued and meaningful activity which gives children ‘a status within<br />

society’ (Renteln, as cited in De Feyter, 1996, p. 439). Indeed, Salazar<br />

argues that traditionally child labour was perceived as ‘an essentially<br />

socializing activity intended to impart skills [for every-day life]’. This<br />

was particularly important in the rural sector, where families <strong>of</strong>ten rely<br />

on subsistence farming and the whole family is expected to contribute<br />

(Salazar, 2001, p. 175). 17 <strong>The</strong>se skills would basically prepare children<br />

for adulthood, which was seen much more as a gradual process and not<br />

a complete separation <strong>of</strong> childhood and adulthood, as it <strong>of</strong>ten is perceived<br />

<strong>of</strong> in the West (although the West is slowly moving back towards<br />

including work experience in education). Furthermore, many Western<br />

children grow up doing the shopping, washing the car or helping out<br />

on the family farm during summer holidays. <strong>The</strong>se skills develop the<br />

child’s sense <strong>of</strong> belonging and a sense <strong>of</strong> responsibility both for him or<br />

herself and for the wider family unit. Child labour is acceptable, as long<br />

as the child is not subjected to hazardous and exploitative forms <strong>of</strong> work.<br />

This becomes more problematic in an economic context where there<br />

has been a shift in the purpose <strong>of</strong> the child’s work away from a socializing<br />

and educative function to that <strong>of</strong> earning a wage (Salazar, 2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> changes brought about by globalization in the trade and labour

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!