3071-The political economy of new slavery
3071-The political economy of new slavery
3071-The political economy of new slavery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
David Ould 67<br />
trafficking victims. Long experience shows that a whole set <strong>of</strong> practical<br />
measures are necessary to enable people who have been trafficked or<br />
enslaved to enjoy their human rights properly: most importantly, states<br />
have to provide some material assistance to enable former slaves to<br />
become self-sufficient economically and thus avoid perpetual dependence.<br />
<strong>The</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> states to do this on many occasions has meant<br />
that <strong>slavery</strong> has only been half-abolished, 5 that the victims are left in<br />
a limbo <strong>of</strong> dependence on their former exploiters or others, and that<br />
long-term resentment builds up, as witnessed with the claims for<br />
reparations at the recent UN World Conference Against Racism. Because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the failure <strong>of</strong> governments to compensate slaves at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
historical triangular slave trade, their descendants and the governments<br />
<strong>of</strong> the countries from where the slaves were taken have increasingly<br />
pressed claims for reparations. This is looked at in detail in Geraldine<br />
Van Bueren’s chapter in this book. Needless to say, as in the case <strong>of</strong> any<br />
other victims <strong>of</strong> crime or major human rights abuse, the immediate<br />
health and other practical needs <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> <strong>slavery</strong> also have to be<br />
attended to.<br />
When confronted with the question <strong>of</strong> what protection to guarantee<br />
to victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking in the UN trafficking protocol, government<br />
representatives did what they do so <strong>of</strong>ten when making international<br />
law: they vacillated and fudged. Eventually they agreed a long list <strong>of</strong><br />
assistance and protection provisions in Article 6 <strong>of</strong> the protocol, but<br />
made all <strong>of</strong> them optional rather than mandatory:<br />
• in appropriate cases and to the extent possible under domestic law,<br />
each State Party shall protect the privacy and identity <strong>of</strong> victims<br />
<strong>of</strong> trafficking in persons, including, inter alia, by making legal proceedings<br />
relating to such trafficking confidential.<br />
• each State Party shall ensure that its domestic legal or administrative<br />
system contains measures that provide to victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking in<br />
persons, in appropriate cases:<br />
(a) Information on relevant court and administrative proceedings;<br />
and<br />
(b) Assistance to enable their views and concerns to be presented and<br />
considered at appropriate stages <strong>of</strong> criminal proceedings against<br />
<strong>of</strong>fenders, in a manner not prejudicial to the rights <strong>of</strong> the defence.<br />
• each State Party shall consider implementing measures to provide<br />
for the physical, psychological, and social recovery <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong>