27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Ould 67<br />

trafficking victims. Long experience shows that a whole set <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

measures are necessary to enable people who have been trafficked or<br />

enslaved to enjoy their human rights properly: most importantly, states<br />

have to provide some material assistance to enable former slaves to<br />

become self-sufficient economically and thus avoid perpetual dependence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> states to do this on many occasions has meant<br />

that <strong>slavery</strong> has only been half-abolished, 5 that the victims are left in<br />

a limbo <strong>of</strong> dependence on their former exploiters or others, and that<br />

long-term resentment builds up, as witnessed with the claims for<br />

reparations at the recent UN World Conference Against Racism. Because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the failure <strong>of</strong> governments to compensate slaves at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

historical triangular slave trade, their descendants and the governments<br />

<strong>of</strong> the countries from where the slaves were taken have increasingly<br />

pressed claims for reparations. This is looked at in detail in Geraldine<br />

Van Bueren’s chapter in this book. Needless to say, as in the case <strong>of</strong> any<br />

other victims <strong>of</strong> crime or major human rights abuse, the immediate<br />

health and other practical needs <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> <strong>slavery</strong> also have to be<br />

attended to.<br />

When confronted with the question <strong>of</strong> what protection to guarantee<br />

to victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking in the UN trafficking protocol, government<br />

representatives did what they do so <strong>of</strong>ten when making international<br />

law: they vacillated and fudged. Eventually they agreed a long list <strong>of</strong><br />

assistance and protection provisions in Article 6 <strong>of</strong> the protocol, but<br />

made all <strong>of</strong> them optional rather than mandatory:<br />

• in appropriate cases and to the extent possible under domestic law,<br />

each State Party shall protect the privacy and identity <strong>of</strong> victims<br />

<strong>of</strong> trafficking in persons, including, inter alia, by making legal proceedings<br />

relating to such trafficking confidential.<br />

• each State Party shall ensure that its domestic legal or administrative<br />

system contains measures that provide to victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking in<br />

persons, in appropriate cases:<br />

(a) Information on relevant court and administrative proceedings;<br />

and<br />

(b) Assistance to enable their views and concerns to be presented and<br />

considered at appropriate stages <strong>of</strong> criminal proceedings against<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders, in a manner not prejudicial to the rights <strong>of</strong> the defence.<br />

• each State Party shall consider implementing measures to provide<br />

for the physical, psychological, and social recovery <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!