3071-The political economy of new slavery
3071-The political economy of new slavery
3071-The political economy of new slavery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
232 Modern Slavery and Fair Trade Products<br />
Empire was only at first an instrument <strong>of</strong> merchant capital, merchant<br />
traders buying cheap and selling dear. It soon involved truly productive<br />
capital, local people being set to work to produce for the<br />
European and North American market, with all the processing and<br />
transporting being kept in European and North American hands.<br />
Barratt Brown, 1993, p. 17<br />
This structure <strong>of</strong> world production and distribution with colonies providing<br />
raw materials, agricultural products and minerals and serving as<br />
markets for European goods, remained virtually unchanged after the<br />
former colonies attained independence.<br />
Fair Trade leaves the structure <strong>of</strong> such unequal exchange relations,<br />
established by force and conquest, intact. <strong>The</strong> fact that economies <strong>of</strong><br />
many developing states depend on exports <strong>of</strong> a few agricultural products,<br />
sometimes a single crop, also exported by many other Third World<br />
countries, is left unquestioned. It is a starting point for the Fair Trade<br />
activists that cocoa exports constitute 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> earnings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Ivory Coast and 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> those <strong>of</strong> Cameroon (Global Exchange [c]).<br />
What is overlooked by Fair Trade activists is that products marketed<br />
through Fair Trade – such as bananas, cocoa, c<strong>of</strong>fee, honey, orange juice,<br />
sugar and tea – are simply exported by too many states. This drives world<br />
prices down and Fair Trade can help at best only a few co-operatives, like<br />
the ones examined above. Significant expansion <strong>of</strong> Fair Trade is hardly<br />
possible, since this would considerably reduce pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />
corporations and raise prices which risks reducing consumption<br />
and thereby damaging producers. But even if Fair Trade were universalizable,<br />
it would still leave the international division <strong>of</strong> labour, established<br />
with colonial expansion and operating at the advantage <strong>of</strong> developed<br />
countries, intact. This would reproduce enormous gaps in technological<br />
and industrial development between the rich and the poor nations.<br />
As regards Fair Trade projects for crafts like TARA projects in India, it<br />
is indisputable that they do give to the poor an opportunity to acquire<br />
basic skills <strong>of</strong> craftsmanship and by paying them a fair price it contributes<br />
to their subsistence. However, how big is the market for such products<br />
and how many producers can it sustain? And even if they are relatively<br />
numerous, will their income from Fair Trade ever be comparable to the<br />
incomes <strong>of</strong> Western workers?<br />
Fair Trade as such, is a ‘problem-solving’ measure, which does not aim<br />
at transcending the existing structures, but at making them function<br />
more smoothly. It does not challenge global inequality as a whole, but<br />
only its most extreme manifestations like forced labour, child labour and