27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

232 Modern Slavery and Fair Trade Products<br />

Empire was only at first an instrument <strong>of</strong> merchant capital, merchant<br />

traders buying cheap and selling dear. It soon involved truly productive<br />

capital, local people being set to work to produce for the<br />

European and North American market, with all the processing and<br />

transporting being kept in European and North American hands.<br />

Barratt Brown, 1993, p. 17<br />

This structure <strong>of</strong> world production and distribution with colonies providing<br />

raw materials, agricultural products and minerals and serving as<br />

markets for European goods, remained virtually unchanged after the<br />

former colonies attained independence.<br />

Fair Trade leaves the structure <strong>of</strong> such unequal exchange relations,<br />

established by force and conquest, intact. <strong>The</strong> fact that economies <strong>of</strong><br />

many developing states depend on exports <strong>of</strong> a few agricultural products,<br />

sometimes a single crop, also exported by many other Third World<br />

countries, is left unquestioned. It is a starting point for the Fair Trade<br />

activists that cocoa exports constitute 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> earnings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ivory Coast and 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> those <strong>of</strong> Cameroon (Global Exchange [c]).<br />

What is overlooked by Fair Trade activists is that products marketed<br />

through Fair Trade – such as bananas, cocoa, c<strong>of</strong>fee, honey, orange juice,<br />

sugar and tea – are simply exported by too many states. This drives world<br />

prices down and Fair Trade can help at best only a few co-operatives, like<br />

the ones examined above. Significant expansion <strong>of</strong> Fair Trade is hardly<br />

possible, since this would considerably reduce pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />

corporations and raise prices which risks reducing consumption<br />

and thereby damaging producers. But even if Fair Trade were universalizable,<br />

it would still leave the international division <strong>of</strong> labour, established<br />

with colonial expansion and operating at the advantage <strong>of</strong> developed<br />

countries, intact. This would reproduce enormous gaps in technological<br />

and industrial development between the rich and the poor nations.<br />

As regards Fair Trade projects for crafts like TARA projects in India, it<br />

is indisputable that they do give to the poor an opportunity to acquire<br />

basic skills <strong>of</strong> craftsmanship and by paying them a fair price it contributes<br />

to their subsistence. However, how big is the market for such products<br />

and how many producers can it sustain? And even if they are relatively<br />

numerous, will their income from Fair Trade ever be comparable to the<br />

incomes <strong>of</strong> Western workers?<br />

Fair Trade as such, is a ‘problem-solving’ measure, which does not aim<br />

at transcending the existing structures, but at making them function<br />

more smoothly. It does not challenge global inequality as a whole, but<br />

only its most extreme manifestations like forced labour, child labour and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!