27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208 Strategies for Change<br />

North do not want to release Third World countries from their dependency.<br />

However, the reality is more complex. Individuals shape norms<br />

and are in turn shaped by norms. Powerful discourses affect reality and<br />

people’s perceptions <strong>of</strong> what type <strong>of</strong> society or change for the better is<br />

indeed possible, both on a theoretical and practical level.<br />

Objections to the Tobin tax<br />

As is to be expected, there are numerous objections against the Tobin<br />

tax. Many are technical and range from concerns about more volatility<br />

in the presence <strong>of</strong> a Tobin tax to warnings that a Tobin tax might not be<br />

enough to solve the problem. Further questions involve, for example,<br />

how high or low the tax rate should be and whether or not all participants<br />

should be taxed or whether governments and central banks should<br />

be ‘trusted’. An additional set <strong>of</strong> questions asks what the tax base should<br />

be and to what extent evasion <strong>of</strong> it could be curbed; what if speculators<br />

move their transactions ‘<strong>of</strong>fshore’ to non-participating countries, or<br />

trade in assets that are not covered by the tax, such as swaps, forwards,<br />

futures and treasury bills? Issues to be decided, further, include the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> comprehensiveness: do all countries have to join, or does<br />

it suffice if countries with major financial centres join? <strong>The</strong>re are fears<br />

that governments will not come to a consensus on the issue, meaning<br />

the tax would be too difficult to enforce. Problems could also occur<br />

around the effects <strong>of</strong> losses on companies. What would companies do<br />

to compensate for losses – would there be a knock-on effect on wages<br />

and employment? And practical issues, such as who should collect<br />

and distribute the tax and in what way, need to be settled. Should it be<br />

national governments, international institutions such as the IMF and<br />

the World Bank, should there be a <strong>new</strong> institution to avoid the pitfalls<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing governance structures reinforcing present unequal power<br />

structures within international <strong>political</strong> and economic relations? <strong>The</strong><br />

beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the tax fund also need to be established. Should developing<br />

countries get to keep all the revenue and developed countries<br />

give it away, should there be a halfway solution? And to what extent<br />

should specific circumstances be allowed to influence the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tax? Should there be a two-tier system whereby a minimal tax is levied<br />

at all times to generate the revenue desired but a surcharge levied in<br />

times <strong>of</strong> extreme volatility to deal with issues <strong>of</strong> instability, as proposed<br />

by Paul Bernd Spahn in 1996? Would it work? Finally, the question has<br />

been asked whether or not we should employ other forms <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

control such as direct capital controls on outflows or inflows, or the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!