27.06.2015 Views

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

3071-The political economy of new slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emma Dowling 209<br />

‘Chilean Model’ (between 1991 and 1998 the Chilean government placed<br />

reserve requirements <strong>of</strong> a limited duration on capital imports, Patterson,<br />

2002, p. 11). 5<br />

I would like to emphasize that questions <strong>of</strong> ‘how’ are most important<br />

even from an early stage as, given the unequal distribution <strong>of</strong> power and<br />

wealth in the international system, great care must be taken to hinder<br />

any implementation <strong>of</strong> the tax favouring those already in power. This<br />

is especially important when it comes to discussing revenue and who<br />

should collect and distribute it in what way. Those that need help must<br />

have a say now in how the tax is implemented or else they run the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> being ignored at a later stage. <strong>The</strong> problem, therefore, is not one that<br />

only financial technocrats should be discussing.<br />

Within the existing literature, discussions about how the tax can deal<br />

with such obstacles is taking place. 6 Nevertheless, the debate is presented<br />

as one in which it is argued whether the tax would work, which<br />

supposedly then provides a justification for whether the tax is desirable.<br />

Not everything we can do, also provides us with an action we should<br />

implement and vice versa. Continuing along such lines <strong>of</strong> argumentation<br />

can become circular if we do not disaggregate what ideological<br />

assumptions and visions <strong>of</strong> society underlie the different arguments<br />

within this debate. Through an analysis <strong>of</strong> the language used to justify<br />

certain positions, one can begin to unpack the underlying motivations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the participants in the debate in order to lay bare the divergent<br />

<strong>political</strong> projects. Using insights from Gramscian theory one can think<br />

about where power plays a role in fostering consent in situations in<br />

which an alternative is deemed impossible, rather than undesirable. 7<br />

Deeming something impossible is a stronger argument than deeming<br />

something undesirable. In order to disentangle power, knowledge and<br />

ideology, I proceed to analyze why and how the proponents and opponents<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Tobin tax argue the way they do. By doing so, I hope to give<br />

a clearer picture <strong>of</strong> why opposition to the tax is more powerful at present<br />

and what the possibilities for change within the existing system are.<br />

Constraints to the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Tobin tax<br />

As Kenneth Kasa <strong>of</strong> the Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> San Francisco argued in<br />

1999, ‘whether a Tobin Tax is desirable depends on your beliefs about<br />

the efficiency <strong>of</strong> international financial markets’ (Kasa, 1999, p. 1). <strong>The</strong><br />

fact that Kasa used the word ‘beliefs’ is quite revealing as it shows that<br />

there is an underlying problem <strong>of</strong> ideology, namely, what does one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!